Skip to main content

Public Interest Immunity Certificate creates Murky situation

This story in today's times (Paywall) reveals:
An accountant wrongly convicted of a fraud allegedly connected to the bribery of civil servants is demanding to see the secret evidence which saved him from a lengthy prison sentence.
Tom Wilson, 52, says he cannot rebuild his life and career because of a court secrecy order which means he and his lawyers are forbidden to know why he was eventually acquitted. Campaigners say Mr Wilson’s case highlights the use of Public Interest Immunity (PII) certificates, which allow government ministers, prosecutors, police and even private companies to ensure evidence remains secret from those facing trial.


I also wrote in The Times:
Parliament must act now

You would think that a Public Interest Immunity (PII) Certificate would be used to protect national security and keep us safe from terrorism.

It is surprising that the order in Tom Wilson’s case appears to have been used to hide the misbehaviour of civil servants and a contractor. But I have seen many cases where the use of different types of secrecy orders create a cover-up and undermine the rule of law. The Government has even lost track of how many PII certificates are given.

Article 5 of the Bill of Rights (1688) in theory should protect the right of citizens to complain to the authorities about wrongdoing in the same way as the first amendment of the US Constitution. However, this is not happening. Parliament needs to act to establish a formal inquiry looking at individual cases in secret courts and to roll back the levels of judicial secrecy.

Comments

Jake Maverick said…
bloody paywall...impossible to comment! but right hand side....not even a joke inquest inquest for Mark Duggan? when you pledged to do away with 'secret inquests'.....well, i dnt suppose many people realised you meant just do with them altogether.....no more promotions to royal protection squad available?
Jake Maverick said…
is there anyway you can find out if one of the PPI things applies to all the evidence of the crimes committed against me? currently being planned? the only way i currently have of finding out even WHO they are is to kill one in self defence....

despite our differences in politics can i rely on you for a character witness at any future kangaroo trial for murder/ diminshed responsibilty thing? ;-)

you've alluded a bit recently to what can euphamistically be termed 'fraudulent psychiatric' reports...but have you ever heard of any case, at any point in the space time continuum where somebody claiming to be a non physical entity AFTER THE FACT was judged to be killed in self defence when they attacked someone?

if i ever stop posting here you'll know why, won't you? sad to say you the only one who might actually notice....
Jake Maverick said…
2nd attempt


nothing to do with parliament....just enforce the existing laws, DPA for one....i'm sure that will actually throw up the evidence to prosecute the perps for the rest!

like all that CCTV footage you got of what you did to me....and the mobile footage....and christ knows what else.....whatever secret files say by people with no names doesn't constitute evidence, of anything (never accused of anything)--- words do mean what words actually do mean!
Jake Maverick said…
regardless of your secret evidence, legal mumbo jumbo hearsay/ bullshit.....a gang off psychopaths in darth avadar masks murdered an unarmed man with machine guns and then lied about it after the fact. another case in a long line of cases. i wish i would be so lucky

and even lying about Cornish pasties now...that's the thing abt compulisve liars, they can't help themselves even whne ther eis no point...what else can you lie about? one has to wonder....at least the last one was tarined liar...you can't really count GB, all he did was nick our gold reserves.....bahamas now probably!

Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

I have only just found this one which I think is accurately reported below (but if it is not please give me an accurate report).

KING’S BENCH DIVISION

R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

November 9 1923

Editor’s comments in bold.

Here, the magistrates’ clerk retired with the bench when they were considering a charge of dangerous driving. The clerk belonged to a firm of solicitors acting in civil proceedings for the other party to the accident. It was entirely irrelevant that there had been no evidence of actual influence brought to bear on the magistrates, and the conviction was duly quashed.

LORD HEWART CJ:
It is clear that the deputy clerk was a member of the firm of solicitors engaged in the conduct of proceedings for damages against the applicant in respect of the same collision as that which gave rise to the charge that the justices were considering. It is said, and, no doubt, truly, that when that gentleman retired in the usual way with the justices, taking with him the…

Statement re Police investigation into Harassment and Perverting the Course of Justice.

It was recently reported that the police were not investigating the allegations of Perverting the Course of Justice that I had made. This came as a surprise to me as I had been told for some time that my allegations were to be considered once the VRR had been rejected. I have now had a very constructive meeting with Staffordshire police on Friday 29th June 2018 and the misunderstandings have been resolved. At that meeting the evidence relating to the perversion of the course of justice and the harassment campaign against my family were discussed. The police have decided to investigate both the perversion of the course of justice and also the harassment campaign. I would like to thank them for changing their decision and I accept their apology for the way in which they did that. I am also in possession of written confirmation a police force would be investigating allegations that a vulnerable witness has been harassed for trying to expose the campaign against me. I hope that the aut…