Skip to main content

Psychiatrist in family courts story in Daily Mail

What people don't fully recognise is how hard it is to take people to the GMC in relation to Family Court proceedings. Congratulations are due to "Miss A" for her efforts on this case.

Of course there are many other experts who should also face disciplinary proceedings for the evidence given in the secret courts.

I refer people to the song I released in 2008.

Comments

Jonathan said…
The story you link to is about a psychiatrist NOT a psychologist.

Psychologists are regulated by the Health Professions Council.
It's not enough to punish the doctor, is it. The children should be returned and the parents should be financially compensated - ASAP!!!...

Sabine
http://victims-unite.net
Jake Maverick said…
@ Jonathon
I don't believe any of them are actually regulated by anybody....do you have any evidence of this unfounded assertion? it's just about arguing over who and how for how long they can have their noses in the trough for s it not?
Jake Maverick said…
why would you censor the other post on this one but completely publish the presstv one? you make no sense wahtsoever!
Jake Maverick said…
can i have ALL my missing posts back please so i have them for posterity? ;-)
Jake Maverick said…
ummm...guess no chance of an answer to that one then! like all those thousands of hours of video footage....guess i'll never know what happened to that either, although considering it's sstill illegal to destroy it for the next couple of months at least they're probably still jerking off to it to this very day?
Jake Maverick said…
oh come on....at least use the old 'we around ad unscrewed all the hard drives that day, for no particular reason' excuse or soemthing.....

& liberal England? where the smeg is that then? unless you somehow managed to get acces to time travel in which case i recommend you nuke the buizzards quick before it becomes illegal....

why only partial banning here? only freedom of speech hereonly if John agrees withya, even if he not publicly allowed to say so?...so why censor the ******* ***** ***** *** *** bit? it was same a Sabine said, bu presumably she meant by the state rather than the **********....you against eople suing their rapist when they win the lottery then? not quite the lottery, but those that did have had many millions stolen from the tapayer, just in 'wages'.....
Jake Maverick said…
psychiatrist, psychologist, Psycho Anal ist....i say potatoe you pot a TOE!
Jake Maverick said…
was it the comment about criminals being held ciminally liable for the crimes they commit that you have a problemw ith then, rather than the financial (tiny) aspect?printedu smsedin
Jake Maverick said…
??????????????????????????

Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

Homelessness vs Selling Books

Candidates in elections tend to find themselves very busy with lots of things to do.  It is, therefore, necessary to prioritise things to ensure that the important things are dealt with.

To me the issue of homelessness and rough sleeping is an important issue.  Therefore, when Birmingham's Faith Leaders group contacted me to ask me what I would propose and whether I would work with them to make things better I was pleased to respond with my views and indicate that I would work with them after the election.

The Faith Leaders Group (Bishops and other religious leaders in Birmingham) have now sent out their report.

Sadly, according to their report,  I was the only candidate for Yardley to respond.  The group in their report said:

"Particularly disappointing was the lack of response from some of those candidates seeking re-election as MP for their respective constituencies."
It is worth looking at the priorities of my opponent.
Interestingly today she has decided to be at th…

Millionaires and politics

The Labour Party spent most of the last election criticising me for being a successful businessman (aka millionaire). That is business in the private sector employing over 250 people. It is worth looking at the situation for the Labour Candidate now:

For the year 2016-7 Annual Income from Parliament74,962Specifically for her book51,250Other media income etc5,322.82Total declared income131,534.82

Traditionally anyone with an annual income of over £100,000 has been considered to be a millionaire. I did not use my position in parliament to increase my income.


I have been asked for sources for this. This BBC piece looks at how one should define rich. It was written in 2011 so the figures will be slightly out of date. There are perhaps 2 relevant pieces:
"In 1880 a rich person would have had £100,000 in assets or an income of £10,000 a year, he says. About a hundred people a year died leaving £100,000 and by 1910 this was 250 - "a microscopic fraction of the number of death…