Skip to main content

The best and the worst

The best people I met on my tour around the city centre were those who had come to help clear up. This is a photograph of the volunteer clean up crew.
IMG_2643
Thanks to the efforts of the city council's staff who started work at 6am most of the mess had been cleared up by this point.

The aftermath of the worst is really looking at the attempts to steal a cashpoint machine.
IMG_2636

All we had was an attempt to loot things. This does not warrant dressing up as anything more than this.

I am now updating my earlier post following meeting with The Chief Constable, other Police Officers and The Deputy Prime Minister.

The looting and vandalism (which is a concentration on looting and "free stuff") is done by ill disciplined youths who are out to get a small amount of money and get up to mischief. Nothing more should be read into it or the other events other than the event in Tottenham which was the catalyst. It is not as technically driven as people think although there is some organisation going on. It is not the serious gang members because the amounts of money involved are generally not worth the risk of being caught and punished.

I support the police strategy of maximising arrests and prosecutions.

Although we do need to find jobs for people generally (not only for young people) that is not related to these acts of theiving. The government needs to back parents and schools in creating a disciplined environment and ensure that the criminals involved are caught and punished.





Comments

Jake Maverick said…
...funny thing, when stuff like this happens in far eastern countries it's calledd a revolution, but over here it's a 'riot' done by 'criminals'....why is that? Bit racist isn't it?

If it weren't for the REAL criminals over here having all the power there wdn't be a problem....i.e. until immunity from prosecution for certain segments of so called 'society' is removed...

it's not even possible to kill a non physical entity....
"Green Credit for Green Purposes" was our proposal to the Treasury Select Committee in 2007 to create jobs - at the time in response to the Stern review on climate change. See http://bit.ly/3U6jCc

The principle is the same for ANY work programme, no matter which age group: the government should print its own money instead of borrowing or using taxes for its income stream.

If the ratio between Cash by governments and Credit by banks was back to where it was after WWII (nearly 50/50), the gap between rich and poor would not continue to widen. Now Cash is a mere 3% in the estimated supply of Credit as "money".

More on http://publicdebts.org.uk/problems/ - as "money" at the root of all rioting.
Jake Maverick said…
four years jail for TALKING?

you break into peoples homs and attackthem in their beds in early hours of the morning, you not only rape, murder, torture and steal not only with impunity you're nearly always promoted for it....yet you still pretend t be too stupid to know why the peasants are revolting? lots more to come I think....

I'm into my eleventh year now of it....dnt think there is anything else you can do to me personally! what is wrong with you 'people'...?

Popular posts from this blog

Homelessness vs Selling Books

Candidates in elections tend to find themselves very busy with lots of things to do.  It is, therefore, necessary to prioritise things to ensure that the important things are dealt with.

To me the issue of homelessness and rough sleeping is an important issue.  Therefore, when Birmingham's Faith Leaders group contacted me to ask me what I would propose and whether I would work with them to make things better I was pleased to respond with my views and indicate that I would work with them after the election.

The Faith Leaders Group (Bishops and other religious leaders in Birmingham) have now sent out their report.

Sadly, according to their report,  I was the only candidate for Yardley to respond.  The group in their report said:

"Particularly disappointing was the lack of response from some of those candidates seeking re-election as MP for their respective constituencies."
It is worth looking at the priorities of my opponent.
Interestingly today she has decided to be at th…

Millionaires and politics

The Labour Party spent most of the last election criticising me for being a successful businessman (aka millionaire). That is business in the private sector employing over 250 people. It is worth looking at the situation for the Labour Candidate now:

For the year 2016-7 Annual Income from Parliament74,962Specifically for her book51,250Other media income etc5,322.82Total declared income131,534.82

Traditionally anyone with an annual income of over £100,000 has been considered to be a millionaire. I did not use my position in parliament to increase my income.


I have been asked for sources for this. This BBC piece looks at how one should define rich. It was written in 2011 so the figures will be slightly out of date. There are perhaps 2 relevant pieces:
"In 1880 a rich person would have had £100,000 in assets or an income of £10,000 a year, he says. About a hundred people a year died leaving £100,000 and by 1910 this was 250 - "a microscopic fraction of the number of death…

The Labour Candidate's Book Promotion Tour and Why It Matters

In the 2015 General Election the Labour Candidate criticised John Hemming for having an external interest and made a pledge that she would be a "Full Time MP for Yardley and my only other job will be mom & carer ...".  Here is a copy of that pledge:


Since that point she has been working on paid Television Programmes and has also written a book. John Hemming has made no secret of the fact that he chairs the board of the company he founded in 1983. This involves one meeting a month. When he was the MP for Yardley he was a full time MP and the Job of being MP for Yardley came first. The Labour candidate has reported 1,274 hours of work other than being an MP in the two years she has been elected and her income in the last year was over £131,000.

Ignoring the question as to how she reconciles that with her "pledge" the question is raised as to what extent her external activity conflicts with the role of Member of Parliament for Yardley. She is supposed to de…