Skip to main content

My phone number is now a state secret (in Jersey)

The linked story is a bit odd. The Jersey police on returning Senator Stuart Syvret his mobile phone had erased my phone number.

It is all a bit weird. There will be an emergency meeting of the Jersey Parliament on Tuesday.

I wonder, however, what the police had to benefit from by deleting my phone number.

It is worth listening to the interview on the link about this.

Comments

Chelloise said…
Once again, the Jersey establishment has shot itself in the foot and drawn more suspicious press attention to the corruption, there..

The island's longest serving and most popular elected official is alternately derided as paranoid or arrested like a terrorist, for "Shafting Jersey in the eyes of the world."

Let's hope tampering with the good senator's phone and erasing your number will be the straw which breaks Big Brother's back, so Jersey may someday enjoy real participatory democracy.
Chelloise said…
Once again, Jersey establishment have cut off their noses to spite their faces by behaving like some third world dictatorship.

Senator Stuart Syvret is their most popular and longest serving elected official, but he is treated as an enemy bent on destroying the island whenever he speaks out about Jersey's lack of governmental transparency.

Do they not see the irony in alternately denigrating the good senator as "paranoid" about Jersey's misuse of political power, just before arresting him in a manner more suited to an armed terrorist?

Surly they know Senator Syvret's blog is only becoming so popular internationally because the public is intrigued by such ridiculous, and highly suspicious methods in their attempts to silence him.

Tampering with his telephone and then erasing your phone number will only further justify to the world what he writes on that "vile blog."

Popular posts from this blog

Millionaires and politics

The Labour Party spent most of the last election criticising me for being a successful businessman (aka millionaire). That is business in the private sector employing over 250 people. It is worth looking at the situation for the Labour Candidate now:

For the year 2016-7 Annual Income from Parliament74,962Specifically for her book51,250Other media income etc5,322.82Total declared income131,534.82

Traditionally anyone with an annual income of over £100,000 has been considered to be a millionaire. I did not use my position in parliament to increase my income.


I have been asked for sources for this. This BBC piece looks at how one should define rich. It was written in 2011 so the figures will be slightly out of date. There are perhaps 2 relevant pieces:
"In 1880 a rich person would have had £100,000 in assets or an income of £10,000 a year, he says. About a hundred people a year died leaving £100,000 and by 1910 this was 250 - "a microscopic fraction of the number of death…

Homelessness vs Selling Books

Candidates in elections tend to find themselves very busy with lots of things to do.  It is, therefore, necessary to prioritise things to ensure that the important things are dealt with.

To me the issue of homelessness and rough sleeping is an important issue.  Therefore, when Birmingham's Faith Leaders group contacted me to ask me what I would propose and whether I would work with them to make things better I was pleased to respond with my views and indicate that I would work with them after the election.

The Faith Leaders Group (Bishops and other religious leaders in Birmingham) have now sent out their report.

Sadly, according to their report,  I was the only candidate for Yardley to respond.  The group in their report said:

"Particularly disappointing was the lack of response from some of those candidates seeking re-election as MP for their respective constituencies."
It is worth looking at the priorities of my opponent.
Interestingly today she has decided to be at th…

Gender Issues comparison of candidates

John Hemming believes that an MP should represent everyone in their constituency.  This should be regardless of their race, religion, gender, abledness, sexual orientation or anything else.  It should be everyone.

When he was an MP he worked on issues relating to men, those relating to women and those relating to non-binary people. Everyone.

For example here is John Hemming on a demonstration outside the courts with the campaign group Women Against Rape (it related to the case of a mother who had her child removed from her because the mother was raped).




Jess Phillips, who campaigns on women's issues, notwithstanding the questions asked about her appointments in her parliamentary office, had the following response when asked for a debate on issues specifically relating to men: