Skip to main content

Election Results 2nd April 2009

Huntingdonshire DC, Ramsey
Con 626 (38.1; -8.1)
UKIP 520 (31.6; +9.8)
LD Robert Mumford 432 (26.3; -0.9)
Lab 67 (4.1; -0.8)
Majority 106
Turnout 25.8%
Con hold
Percentage change is since May 2008

Redcar and Cleveland BC, Dormanstown
LD 809 (42.4; +17.3)
Lab 667 (35.0; -17.1)
BNP 305 (16.6; +16.6)
Con 125 (6.6; -16.2)
Majority 142
Turnout 36.8%
LD gain from Lab
Percentage change is since May 2007

Leeds City, Temple Newsam
Con 1785 (28.0; -5.9)
BNP 1502 (23.6; +1.4)
Lab 1476 (23.2; -6.4)
LD Ian Dowling 1468 (23.1; +15.6)
Green 137 (2.2; +2.2)
[Ind (0.0; -6.9)]
Majority 283
Turnout not known
Con gain from Lab
Percentage change is since May 2008

Camden LBC, Belsize
LD Tom Simon 1136 (46.0; +5.4)
Con 952 (38.6; +1.7)
Lab 270 (10.9; -3.2)
Green 109 (4.4; -3.9)
Majority 184
Turnout 29.8%
LD hold
Percentage change is since May 2006

Huntingdon TC, East
Con 751/716 (51.2)
LD Patricia Shrapnell 567 / Jacqueline Buck 562 (38.6)
Lab 150/103 (10.2)
Majorities 184/149
Turnout 21.1%
Con hold x 2

Bridport TC
Con 381 (40.7)
LD Harry Britton 335 (35.8)
Ind 149 (15.9)
Lab 70 (7.5)
Majority 46
Turnout 27.1%
Con gain from LD

Calderdale MBC, Skircoat
Con 1327 (36.8; -17.2)
LD Pauline Nash 1209 (33.5; +0.5)
Lab 274 (7.6; -0.2)
Ind 238 (6.6; +6.6)
BNP 235 (6.5; +6.5)
Ind 229 (6.4; +6.4)
Green 92 (2.6; -2.6)
Majority 118
Turnout 38.1%
Con hold
Percentage change is since May 2008

South Holland DC, Moulton, Weston and Cowbit
Con 937 (81.1; +28.5)
LD Anne Elizabeth Ramkaran 219 (18.9; +18.9)
[UKIP (0.0; -16.6)]
[Ind (0.0; -30.9)]
Majority 718
Turnout 21.9%
Con hold
Percentage change is since May 2007

Arun DC, Felpham West
Con 630 (52.1; +12.8)
LD Martin Denis Lury 269 (22.2; +6.2)
BNP 165 (13.6; +13.6)
UKIP 89 (7.4; -8.8)
Lab 56 (4.6; +4.6)
[Ind (0.0; -28.4)]
Majority 361
Turnout 30.2%
Con hold
Percentage change is since May 2007

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

Homelessness vs Selling Books

Candidates in elections tend to find themselves very busy with lots of things to do.  It is, therefore, necessary to prioritise things to ensure that the important things are dealt with.

To me the issue of homelessness and rough sleeping is an important issue.  Therefore, when Birmingham's Faith Leaders group contacted me to ask me what I would propose and whether I would work with them to make things better I was pleased to respond with my views and indicate that I would work with them after the election.

The Faith Leaders Group (Bishops and other religious leaders in Birmingham) have now sent out their report.

Sadly, according to their report,  I was the only candidate for Yardley to respond.  The group in their report said:

"Particularly disappointing was the lack of response from some of those candidates seeking re-election as MP for their respective constituencies."
It is worth looking at the priorities of my opponent.
Interestingly today she has decided to be at th…

Millionaires and politics

The Labour Party spent most of the last election criticising me for being a successful businessman (aka millionaire). That is business in the private sector employing over 250 people. It is worth looking at the situation for the Labour Candidate now:

For the year 2016-7 Annual Income from Parliament74,962Specifically for her book51,250Other media income etc5,322.82Total declared income131,534.82

Traditionally anyone with an annual income of over £100,000 has been considered to be a millionaire. I did not use my position in parliament to increase my income.


I have been asked for sources for this. This BBC piece looks at how one should define rich. It was written in 2011 so the figures will be slightly out of date. There are perhaps 2 relevant pieces:
"In 1880 a rich person would have had £100,000 in assets or an income of £10,000 a year, he says. About a hundred people a year died leaving £100,000 and by 1910 this was 250 - "a microscopic fraction of the number of death…