Skip to main content

David Davis' 42 day Haltemprice and Howden by-election

David Davis' decision is not unique.

There is a long track record of people resigning their own seats to fight by-elections. There used to be such a tradition when people were appointed as cabinet ministers.

In 1912 George Lansbury was Labour MP for Bow and Bromley and a strong supporter of votes for women. When the Labour Party gave lukewarm support, Lansbury resigned to seek re-election with a clear mandate on the single issue. The Conservatives fought the seat hard and won. However in that case there was a Liberal government. The Liberals deliberately decided not to stand but did not endorse Lansbury either. Lansbury was beaten by a Mr Blair. Although Lansbury lost in 1918 he won the seat again at every election from 1922 until his death in 1940.

In 1938 The Duchess of Atholl, who had resigned the Conserative whip earlier in the Parliament, resigned Kinross and Western Perthshire to fight a by-election in opposition to appeasement but lost the seat to the new Conservative candidate.

1955 - Sir Richard Acland in Gravesend resigned in protest over Labour's support for nuclear defence to fight as an independent but the general election overtook events and the Conservatives gained the seat

In 1973 - Dick Taverne was deselected by Labour and fought essentially as a "Democratic Labour" independent and held his seat. He had no Liberal Candidate against him.

In 1982 - Bruce Douglas-Mann in Mitcham & Morden resigned on changing from Labour to SDP. The tories won because this was after the Falklands war. My feeling is had he done this immediately he would have won and the delay (persuaded by his colleagues - who did not do the same) caused the loss.

In 1986 15 Unionist MPs resigned to fight the Anglo-Irish agreement. Although they had generally little opposition the SDLP did make one gain against them.

(hat tip to various people on vote-2007.)

I am surprised at Labour bottling this. However, it appears that Kelvin Mackenzie may put up against him.
Note that Nick Robinson says "This resignation is quite extraordinary and without precedent that I can think of in British politics and means that politics is now utterly unpredictable." hmmm


Stephen Glenn said…
Clearly Nick is not a student of political history or just has a very short memory. It's a shame the the BBC's chief political correspondent just doesn't know his stuff.
Stephen Glenn said…
As for the Northern Irish Unionist the natural opposition was mostly from the other main unionist party and the pact that only the resigning party would stand in the by elections led to there being little oppostion. Of course some of the tighter Unionist/Nationalist seats did lead a slight discomfort for about 3 of the contests.
PoliticalHack said…
Not bottling anything John - no more than the Lib Dems are wimping out of the contest.

Why should we expend money and energy on a contest solely relating to Davis' ego? Why should we take part in an exercise that will cost the people of that area some £100,000 for no gain? Let DD have his fun, but I don't believe Labour should show up to a fight because he demands it.

Popular posts from this blog

Millionaires and politics

The Labour Party spent most of the last election criticising me for being a successful businessman (aka millionaire). That is business in the private sector employing over 250 people. It is worth looking at the situation for the Labour Candidate now:

For the year 2016-7 Annual Income from Parliament74,962Specifically for her book51,250Other media income etc5,322.82Total declared income131,534.82

Traditionally anyone with an annual income of over £100,000 has been considered to be a millionaire. I did not use my position in parliament to increase my income.

I have been asked for sources for this. This BBC piece looks at how one should define rich. It was written in 2011 so the figures will be slightly out of date. There are perhaps 2 relevant pieces:
"In 1880 a rich person would have had £100,000 in assets or an income of £10,000 a year, he says. About a hundred people a year died leaving £100,000 and by 1910 this was 250 - "a microscopic fraction of the number of death…

Homelessness vs Selling Books

Candidates in elections tend to find themselves very busy with lots of things to do.  It is, therefore, necessary to prioritise things to ensure that the important things are dealt with.

To me the issue of homelessness and rough sleeping is an important issue.  Therefore, when Birmingham's Faith Leaders group contacted me to ask me what I would propose and whether I would work with them to make things better I was pleased to respond with my views and indicate that I would work with them after the election.

The Faith Leaders Group (Bishops and other religious leaders in Birmingham) have now sent out their report.

Sadly, according to their report,  I was the only candidate for Yardley to respond.  The group in their report said:

"Particularly disappointing was the lack of response from some of those candidates seeking re-election as MP for their respective constituencies."
It is worth looking at the priorities of my opponent.
Interestingly today she has decided to be at th…

Gender Issues comparison of candidates

John Hemming believes that an MP should represent everyone in their constituency.  This should be regardless of their race, religion, gender, abledness, sexual orientation or anything else.  It should be everyone.

When he was an MP he worked on issues relating to men, those relating to women and those relating to non-binary people. Everyone.

For example here is John Hemming on a demonstration outside the courts with the campaign group Women Against Rape (it related to the case of a mother who had her child removed from her because the mother was raped).

Jess Phillips, who campaigns on women's issues, notwithstanding the questions asked about her appointments in her parliamentary office, had the following response when asked for a debate on issues specifically relating to men: