Skip to main content

A few photos

Collecting signatures at the Wheatsheaf, Sheldon for the Knife Crime Petition
Putting sustainable fuel in the tank
Getting the fuel from Wednesbury
Relaunching Sheldon Community Centre and opening the Fun Day.

I am setting up a facility for people to refuel relatively easy using pure rapeseed oil and paying the 27p duty to Mr Brown. There are no planning issue, but the Health and Safety Executive have some controls. The flashpoint for vegetable oil is about 220C so we really don't have to worry about explosions (petrol for example is -40C)

An extract from my last email from the HSE:
Flashpoint is one of the main properties used to determine the fire and
explosion hazard of a material. The flashpoint is defined as the
temperature to which a liquid must be heated before it will produce a
mixture of vapour in air which can be ignited. Lower flashpoint liquids,
particularly those with flashpoints at or below ambient temperature, need
particular care when being handled.

As examples,

The flashpoint of petrol is - 40°C
The flashpoint of methanol is 11°C
The flashpoint of diesel is at least 55°C

The flashpoint of vegetable oil will depend on the original source
material, but for rape-seed oil it is quoted as 220°C.

The flashpoint of bio-diesel again depends on the source material. It is
significantly higher than conventional diesel, and flashpoints may be
between 125 and 150°C. In use bio-diesel is usually blended with
conventional diesel, a typical ratio being 20% bio-diesel / 80%
conventional diesel. The flashpoint of this fuel will be close to that of
conventional diesel material, ie roughly 55°C.

Storage of bio-diesel and its blends does not give rise to additional areas
of concern, (in comparison to diesel), and the guidance set out in HSG176
for higher flashpoint liquids can be applied.


ecofx said…
"I am setting up a facility for people to refuel relatively easy using pure rapeseed oil and paying the 27p duty to Mr Brown."

Congratulations on this! Is there a connection here to Steve Dewar and his enthusiasm for this topic?

I am, however, worried about the ecological footprint generated by inefficient transport, even though CO2 neutrality and sustainable product production are important steps. Have you looked at what your car's footprint is like in terms of hectares or acres of land use? Also, have you seen the Greenpeace video on electricity generation (approx. 18 mins, available via videosites), in which conventional generation is likened to buying a pint of beer and throwing two thirds away before you drink it? For most cars the scenario is much worse. Compared to what is realistically achieveable, over 5/6ths of the fuel are 'wasted', due mainly to the inefficiencies of combustion and the high weight of our vehicles.
I appreciate that this move of yours is a practical step, which makes it easier for Yardlians to take a 'step' in the right direction. One step at a time in practise is worth two in theory ;).
john said…
Not sure who Steve Dewar is. In terms of the sustainability of transport one of the key issues is in fact how far you travel.

The second law of thermodynamics and the Carnot Cycle are the things that drive the efficiency of most heat based engines.

CCGT gas generators run at 55% efficiency. With CHP the waste heat can be "used" as well.

Diesel engines can hit an efficiency of 50%, but transmission losses will take that down.

Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

Homelessness vs Selling Books

Candidates in elections tend to find themselves very busy with lots of things to do.  It is, therefore, necessary to prioritise things to ensure that the important things are dealt with.

To me the issue of homelessness and rough sleeping is an important issue.  Therefore, when Birmingham's Faith Leaders group contacted me to ask me what I would propose and whether I would work with them to make things better I was pleased to respond with my views and indicate that I would work with them after the election.

The Faith Leaders Group (Bishops and other religious leaders in Birmingham) have now sent out their report.

Sadly, according to their report,  I was the only candidate for Yardley to respond.  The group in their report said:

"Particularly disappointing was the lack of response from some of those candidates seeking re-election as MP for their respective constituencies."
It is worth looking at the priorities of my opponent.
Interestingly today she has decided to be at th…

Millionaires and politics

The Labour Party spent most of the last election criticising me for being a successful businessman (aka millionaire). That is business in the private sector employing over 250 people. It is worth looking at the situation for the Labour Candidate now:

For the year 2016-7 Annual Income from Parliament74,962Specifically for her book51,250Other media income etc5,322.82Total declared income131,534.82

Traditionally anyone with an annual income of over £100,000 has been considered to be a millionaire. I did not use my position in parliament to increase my income.

I have been asked for sources for this. This BBC piece looks at how one should define rich. It was written in 2011 so the figures will be slightly out of date. There are perhaps 2 relevant pieces:
"In 1880 a rich person would have had £100,000 in assets or an income of £10,000 a year, he says. About a hundred people a year died leaving £100,000 and by 1910 this was 250 - "a microscopic fraction of the number of death…