Skip to main content

Children and Families Campaigning Summary Report

Family Court Secrecy
Many people will know of the difficulties that have historically been caused by secrecy in the Family Courts. There have been three recent changes that are of significance in this area.

The Family Proceedings (Amendment No 4) Rules 2005
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2005/20051976.htm

This change to the rules relating to the family courts make it much easier for parties to obtain advice and discuss the proceedings with advisers. This means that parties can now talk to "A lay advisor or MacKenzie friend" to obtain advice about the proceedings when they are live. This has to be in confidence, but it does make it possible to discuss matters with campaign groups before it is too late. Those details cannot be publicised, however,

Simon Clayton's hearing into secrecy
http://www.simonclayton.org.uk/
Simon Clayton set a landmark Court of Appeal ruling that ended the automatic ban on identifying children involved in family court cases after proceedings has ended. The blanket of silence that prevented public discussion of decisions to take children from their families was lifted.

Consultation on opening up proceedings in family courts
http://www.dca.gov.uk/consult/courttransparencey1106/cp1106.htm
This is an important consultation into a more widespread opening up of access to Family Court Cases. The consultation remains open. An area where concern remains is mechanisms to prevent continual perjury in Family Courts.

Conflicts of Interest in Family Proceedings
One area which has gone relatively quiet is that of the conflict of interest in Child Protection Departments also being responsible for provision of support. This conflict of interest causes many of the difficulties that lie within child protection. A House of Commons motion will be laid down later this year to argue for this change to be introduced. Any comments would be welcome.

Casework Support
http://www.fassit.co.uk/
FASSIT amongst others are working to bring balance back into Child Protection proceedings by acting to assist families in ensuring that Social Workers follow legal proceedings. Certain test cases are being monitored by FASSIT and myself to ensure that children are not maltreated by Social Services removing them unlawfully from their families.

Munchausens Syndrome by Proxy Review (FII)
A group of MPs chaired by Dr Richard Taylor MP is reviewing the guidelines used for referring children to Social Services Departments. They are paricularly interested in any cases of wrongful references. If people have details could those details be emailed to Oliver Cyriax (see email address below)
mail@cyriax.freeserve.co.uk
Children and Families Comprehensive Spending Review
The government is reviewing expenditure in each budget heading. People may wish to argue that money spent in assisting families in looking after their children would be more cost effective than expensive residential and foster care.

Joint HM Treasury and Department for Education and Skills Children and Young People's Review: terms of reference (DfES/HMT)http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/media/3DE/13/cyp_statement050706.pdf

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Millionaires and politics

The Labour Party spent most of the last election criticising me for being a successful businessman (aka millionaire). That is business in the private sector employing over 250 people. It is worth looking at the situation for the Labour Candidate now:

For the year 2016-7 Annual Income from Parliament74,962Specifically for her book51,250Other media income etc5,322.82Total declared income131,534.82

Traditionally anyone with an annual income of over £100,000 has been considered to be a millionaire. I did not use my position in parliament to increase my income.


I have been asked for sources for this. This BBC piece looks at how one should define rich. It was written in 2011 so the figures will be slightly out of date. There are perhaps 2 relevant pieces:
"In 1880 a rich person would have had £100,000 in assets or an income of £10,000 a year, he says. About a hundred people a year died leaving £100,000 and by 1910 this was 250 - "a microscopic fraction of the number of death…

Gender Issues comparison of candidates

John Hemming believes that an MP should represent everyone in their constituency.  This should be regardless of their race, religion, gender, abledness, sexual orientation or anything else.  It should be everyone.

When he was an MP he worked on issues relating to men, those relating to women and those relating to non-binary people. Everyone.

For example here is John Hemming on a demonstration outside the courts with the campaign group Women Against Rape (it related to the case of a mother who had her child removed from her because the mother was raped).




Jess Phillips, who campaigns on women's issues, notwithstanding the questions asked about her appointments in her parliamentary office, had the following response when asked for a debate on issues specifically relating to men:

The Labour Candidate's Book Promotion Tour and Why It Matters

In the 2015 General Election the Labour Candidate criticised John Hemming for having an external interest and made a pledge that she would be a "Full Time MP for Yardley and my only other job will be mom & carer ...".  Here is a copy of that pledge:


Since that point she has been working on paid Television Programmes and has also written a book. John Hemming has made no secret of the fact that he chairs the board of the company he founded in 1983. This involves one meeting a month. When he was the MP for Yardley he was a full time MP and the Job of being MP for Yardley came first. The Labour candidate has reported 1,274 hours of work other than being an MP in the two years she has been elected and her income in the last year was over £131,000.

Ignoring the question as to how she reconciles that with her "pledge" the question is raised as to what extent her external activity conflicts with the role of Member of Parliament for Yardley. She is supposed to de…