Skip to main content

Labour vote fragments in Birmingham

An initial glance at the results for Birmingham shows the Labour vote fragmenting.

For example they lost the Moseley and Kings Heath seat to the Lib Dems. Labour had only 31% of the vote. However, the opposition to Labour was fragmented and we had about 33% of the vote - enough to win, however.

Because of the boundary changes comparisons need to be made to the all up elections, but that is relatively difficult because sometimes parties (eg UKIP, Green, BNP) only put up 1 candidate in those situations.

There are two comparison techniques the largest vote technique and the percentage of overall vote technique. Both of these have their problems.

Comments

TonyF said…
I see that your Nechells candidate didn't get elected. I take it that it means you vote fraud investigation will be swept under the carpet now.
TonyF said…
By the way, you forgot to mention that you lost Aston so no real gain at all.
Richard Allen said…
John

Your party suffered a very poor night picking up only 9 out of 40 seats and failing to gain several target seets. You are clearly on the retreat in inner city Birmingham and the highs of 2003 seem some time ago. Both Labour and the Conservatives will be fairly happy with the results where as your party is not. Don't insult people's inteligence by acting otherwise.
john said…
The issue in the inner city is the intervention of Respect. In Lozells Lib Dem and Respect was about 3,000 against Labour 3,300.

In Springfield Labour's majority over Lib Dem was about 500 and Respect got about 1700 votes.

Sparkbrook is more complex.

In Aston the Respect Intervention did not have the same effect, however.

The nature of Inner City politics, however, is that party allegiences are only a part of the story.
john said…
As far as Nechells is going we are awaiting the result of the Police Investigation.
TonyF said…
Having checked the results there are more 3rd and 4th positions than 2nd or 1st. One thing I am proud of, at least when I was the candidate in Stockland Green I never ended up with a pathetic vote behind the BNP! John, put your hands in the air and admit that is was a poor night for the Lib Dems in Birmingham
Richard Allen said…
Of course the Respect was part of the story in a handful of wards but that doesn't make the result any better for you. 9 out of 40 wards is a poor result. Your assertion that only the Lib Dem's can beat Labour looks increasingly absurd.

Anyway. Only a week ago you said you had a chance in Tyburn yet you actually finished fourth. Cllr Holtum probable isn't too cherful this morning.
Simon said…
In John's defence there were some good LD results in wards they were defending - Perry Barr, Selly Oak and Bordesley, all hitherto fairly marginal wards which now look secure for them. However, there's no doubt that their performance in their target seats was fairly disastrous. Even the solitary gain in Moseley was more marginal than it ought to have been.

John's assessment of early yesterday evening that 'this is a very good night for the Alden family' looks a more honest summary.
TonyF said…
Praising Tories? Hmmm
TonyF said…
Selly Oak and Perry Barr marginal?
As for Moseley, let's hope Zaman Khan remembers the precious little help he got. But then again, he doesn't work for John, does he?
Simon said…
"Selly Oak and Perry Barr marginal?"

In terms of the gap between third and fourth place in those wards in 2004, yes. Given the solidity of the Labour vote elsewhere you might have expected them to be closer this time. But I'm not interested in talking up the Lib Dems, just pointing out that their results weren't uniformly poor.
TonyF said…
Ah, but the idea is to also take seats, not just hold the ones you've got or play 'win one, lose one'.
Now take a look at the results and tell me whether you think,out of 40 wards, coming nowhere in 25 of those wards, 15 of which are below the BNP vote, that is doing well?
I don't think so!
Simon said…
Yes, I agree.
john said…
I have not looked through all of the seats as yet. We have made good progress in terms of support in marginal seats such as Selly Oak and Perry Barr.

Hodge Hill remains a good target seat as do others, but the opposition to Labour was fragmented.
john said…
If you look at the citywide figures at the equivalent place in the previous parliaments Labour's vote has dropped over 10% and our vote has gone up a bit. The tory vote has also dropped.

Popular posts from this blog

Homelessness vs Selling Books

Candidates in elections tend to find themselves very busy with lots of things to do.  It is, therefore, necessary to prioritise things to ensure that the important things are dealt with.

To me the issue of homelessness and rough sleeping is an important issue.  Therefore, when Birmingham's Faith Leaders group contacted me to ask me what I would propose and whether I would work with them to make things better I was pleased to respond with my views and indicate that I would work with them after the election.

The Faith Leaders Group (Bishops and other religious leaders in Birmingham) have now sent out their report.

Sadly, according to their report,  I was the only candidate for Yardley to respond.  The group in their report said:

"Particularly disappointing was the lack of response from some of those candidates seeking re-election as MP for their respective constituencies."
It is worth looking at the priorities of my opponent.
Interestingly today she has decided to be at th…

Millionaires and politics

The Labour Party spent most of the last election criticising me for being a successful businessman (aka millionaire). That is business in the private sector employing over 250 people. It is worth looking at the situation for the Labour Candidate now:

For the year 2016-7 Annual Income from Parliament74,962Specifically for her book51,250Other media income etc5,322.82Total declared income131,534.82

Traditionally anyone with an annual income of over £100,000 has been considered to be a millionaire. I did not use my position in parliament to increase my income.


I have been asked for sources for this. This BBC piece looks at how one should define rich. It was written in 2011 so the figures will be slightly out of date. There are perhaps 2 relevant pieces:
"In 1880 a rich person would have had £100,000 in assets or an income of £10,000 a year, he says. About a hundred people a year died leaving £100,000 and by 1910 this was 250 - "a microscopic fraction of the number of death…

The Labour Candidate's Book Promotion Tour and Why It Matters

In the 2015 General Election the Labour Candidate criticised John Hemming for having an external interest and made a pledge that she would be a "Full Time MP for Yardley and my only other job will be mom & carer ...".  Here is a copy of that pledge:


Since that point she has been working on paid Television Programmes and has also written a book. John Hemming has made no secret of the fact that he chairs the board of the company he founded in 1983. This involves one meeting a month. When he was the MP for Yardley he was a full time MP and the Job of being MP for Yardley came first. The Labour candidate has reported 1,274 hours of work other than being an MP in the two years she has been elected and her income in the last year was over £131,000.

Ignoring the question as to how she reconciles that with her "pledge" the question is raised as to what extent her external activity conflicts with the role of Member of Parliament for Yardley. She is supposed to de…