Skip to main content

Labour vote fragments in Birmingham

An initial glance at the results for Birmingham shows the Labour vote fragmenting.

For example they lost the Moseley and Kings Heath seat to the Lib Dems. Labour had only 31% of the vote. However, the opposition to Labour was fragmented and we had about 33% of the vote - enough to win, however.

Because of the boundary changes comparisons need to be made to the all up elections, but that is relatively difficult because sometimes parties (eg UKIP, Green, BNP) only put up 1 candidate in those situations.

There are two comparison techniques the largest vote technique and the percentage of overall vote technique. Both of these have their problems.


TonyF said…
I see that your Nechells candidate didn't get elected. I take it that it means you vote fraud investigation will be swept under the carpet now.
TonyF said…
By the way, you forgot to mention that you lost Aston so no real gain at all.
Richard Allen said…

Your party suffered a very poor night picking up only 9 out of 40 seats and failing to gain several target seets. You are clearly on the retreat in inner city Birmingham and the highs of 2003 seem some time ago. Both Labour and the Conservatives will be fairly happy with the results where as your party is not. Don't insult people's inteligence by acting otherwise.
john said…
The issue in the inner city is the intervention of Respect. In Lozells Lib Dem and Respect was about 3,000 against Labour 3,300.

In Springfield Labour's majority over Lib Dem was about 500 and Respect got about 1700 votes.

Sparkbrook is more complex.

In Aston the Respect Intervention did not have the same effect, however.

The nature of Inner City politics, however, is that party allegiences are only a part of the story.
john said…
As far as Nechells is going we are awaiting the result of the Police Investigation.
TonyF said…
Having checked the results there are more 3rd and 4th positions than 2nd or 1st. One thing I am proud of, at least when I was the candidate in Stockland Green I never ended up with a pathetic vote behind the BNP! John, put your hands in the air and admit that is was a poor night for the Lib Dems in Birmingham
Richard Allen said…
Of course the Respect was part of the story in a handful of wards but that doesn't make the result any better for you. 9 out of 40 wards is a poor result. Your assertion that only the Lib Dem's can beat Labour looks increasingly absurd.

Anyway. Only a week ago you said you had a chance in Tyburn yet you actually finished fourth. Cllr Holtum probable isn't too cherful this morning.
Simon said…
In John's defence there were some good LD results in wards they were defending - Perry Barr, Selly Oak and Bordesley, all hitherto fairly marginal wards which now look secure for them. However, there's no doubt that their performance in their target seats was fairly disastrous. Even the solitary gain in Moseley was more marginal than it ought to have been.

John's assessment of early yesterday evening that 'this is a very good night for the Alden family' looks a more honest summary.
TonyF said…
Praising Tories? Hmmm
TonyF said…
Selly Oak and Perry Barr marginal?
As for Moseley, let's hope Zaman Khan remembers the precious little help he got. But then again, he doesn't work for John, does he?
Simon said…
"Selly Oak and Perry Barr marginal?"

In terms of the gap between third and fourth place in those wards in 2004, yes. Given the solidity of the Labour vote elsewhere you might have expected them to be closer this time. But I'm not interested in talking up the Lib Dems, just pointing out that their results weren't uniformly poor.
TonyF said…
Ah, but the idea is to also take seats, not just hold the ones you've got or play 'win one, lose one'.
Now take a look at the results and tell me whether you think,out of 40 wards, coming nowhere in 25 of those wards, 15 of which are below the BNP vote, that is doing well?
I don't think so!
Simon said…
Yes, I agree.
john said…
I have not looked through all of the seats as yet. We have made good progress in terms of support in marginal seats such as Selly Oak and Perry Barr.

Hodge Hill remains a good target seat as do others, but the opposition to Labour was fragmented.
john said…
If you look at the citywide figures at the equivalent place in the previous parliaments Labour's vote has dropped over 10% and our vote has gone up a bit. The tory vote has also dropped.

Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

Statement re Police investigation into Harassment and Perverting the Course of Justice.

It was recently reported that the police were not investigating the allegations of Perverting the Course of Justice that I had made. This came as a surprise to me as I had been told for some time that my allegations were to be considered once the VRR had been rejected. I have now had a very constructive meeting with Staffordshire police on Friday 29th June 2018 and the misunderstandings have been resolved. At that meeting the evidence relating to the perversion of the course of justice and the harassment campaign against my family were discussed. The police have decided to investigate both the perversion of the course of justice and also the harassment campaign. I would like to thank them for changing their decision and I accept their apology for the way in which they did that. I am also in possession of written confirmation a police force would be investigating allegations that a vulnerable witness has been harassed for trying to expose the campaign against me. I hope that the aut…

R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

I have only just found this one which I think is accurately reported below (but if it is not please give me an accurate report).


R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

November 9 1923

Editor’s comments in bold.

Here, the magistrates’ clerk retired with the bench when they were considering a charge of dangerous driving. The clerk belonged to a firm of solicitors acting in civil proceedings for the other party to the accident. It was entirely irrelevant that there had been no evidence of actual influence brought to bear on the magistrates, and the conviction was duly quashed.

It is clear that the deputy clerk was a member of the firm of solicitors engaged in the conduct of proceedings for damages against the applicant in respect of the same collision as that which gave rise to the charge that the justices were considering. It is said, and, no doubt, truly, that when that gentleman retired in the usual way with the justices, taking with him the…