Skip to main content

Dunfermline and Birmingham

The excellent result in Dunfermline shows that we are making further progress against Labour. In Birmingham that is good news for the Lib Dems in Yardley, Hodge Hill, Hall Green, Ladywood and Perry Barr each of which is a clear Lib Dem/Labour battleground.


Unity said…
Hodge Hill?


"LIBERAL Democrats are jumping ship to Labour because they disapprove of the recent revelations regarding Charles Kennedy and Simon Hughes's private lives, a defector warned.

The Lib Dems succeeded in reaching out to Muslims because of their opposition to the Iraq war, contributing to their record election result last year when they won 62 seats.

But revelations about former leader Charles Kennedy and leadership contender Simon Hughes could repel Muslims, according to Mohammed Aikhlaq, the former vice-chairman of the Lib Dems in Hodge Hill, Birmingham.

He has switched sides and joined the Labour Party, along with Ishtiaq Ali, former chairman of the Hodge Hill branch, and six local activists."
john said…
The original story about these people was in The Times which accepted that they had decided to jump ship in December before all the stuff about CK.

In any event we have about twice as many people going the other way which may not be such a big press story, but impacts on election support.
Bob Piper said…
Not sure I want to welcome Muslims who join the Party on the basis of homophobia, anyway.
TonyF said…
Twice as many going the other way? You seem to forget that one of your biggest recruit finders is now an Independant Councillor. How many Muslim supporters did he take with him?
Also, the asians who joined in Stockland Green are gradually slipping back to Labour.
PoliticalHack said…
Ladywood - 6801 majority
Hodge Hill - 5449 majority
Hall Green - 5714 majority (LDs in third place, 10,000 votes behind the winner)
Perry Barr - 7948 majority
Yardley - 2672 between LD and Labour.

I've not run the detailed figures for the new ward structure, but I doubt it will make any huge difference. Out of those, only one is a battleground in any true sense.

Bring it on.
john said…
The new Hall Green contains only one ward from the old Hall Green.
Richard Allen said…
Hall Green could be very close. Anthony Wells gives Labour a notional majority of 4,375. That's far from safe.

Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

Statement re Police investigation into Harassment and Perverting the Course of Justice.

It was recently reported that the police were not investigating the allegations of Perverting the Course of Justice that I had made. This came as a surprise to me as I had been told for some time that my allegations were to be considered once the VRR had been rejected. I have now had a very constructive meeting with Staffordshire police on Friday 29th June 2018 and the misunderstandings have been resolved. At that meeting the evidence relating to the perversion of the course of justice and the harassment campaign against my family were discussed. The police have decided to investigate both the perversion of the course of justice and also the harassment campaign. I would like to thank them for changing their decision and I accept their apology for the way in which they did that. I am also in possession of written confirmation a police force would be investigating allegations that a vulnerable witness has been harassed for trying to expose the campaign against me. I hope that the aut…

R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

I have only just found this one which I think is accurately reported below (but if it is not please give me an accurate report).


R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

November 9 1923

Editor’s comments in bold.

Here, the magistrates’ clerk retired with the bench when they were considering a charge of dangerous driving. The clerk belonged to a firm of solicitors acting in civil proceedings for the other party to the accident. It was entirely irrelevant that there had been no evidence of actual influence brought to bear on the magistrates, and the conviction was duly quashed.

It is clear that the deputy clerk was a member of the firm of solicitors engaged in the conduct of proceedings for damages against the applicant in respect of the same collision as that which gave rise to the charge that the justices were considering. It is said, and, no doubt, truly, that when that gentleman retired in the usual way with the justices, taking with him the…