Skip to main content

Statement by the Birmingham Strategic Partnership Post 7/7 Group.

Birmingham, in common with all great cities, faces more challenges as a
consequence of the atrocities of 7/7 and attempted atrocities of 21/7.
These are challenges we need to face together so that we develop a society
based upon principles such as security and justice rather than sliding into
intolerance and conflict. In the coming years, Birmingham will continue to become a more ethnically diverse city, a fact which we should promote and be pround of. Integration, trust and respect between the various ethnic and religious communities within the city is not only desirable, but essential for Birmingham's economy to prosper. Indeed, the long term success of the city is dependent on it. We must work against polarisation and towards a tolerant, diverse society built on cooperation, trust, security and understanding.

In Birmingham we can all contribute towards the objective of a peaceful, prosperous,
secure and just society which everyone feels equally part of and whose
members views are listened to and responded to.

We call upon all the organisations in Birmingham to work together towards
these ends. At this particular time communication is the key. Whilst the BSP acknowledges the valuable contributions made by many organisations and individuals to community consultation, the BSP must re-double its efforts to hear the views of those who are not normally listened to as part of normal consultation events. Young people, women, those people who go to the gym, snooker
hall or public house, need to feel just as involved as elderly male
community leaders. The city requires consultation processes which can reach more widely than, but are entirely inclusive of, faith communities.

We call upon all organisations in Birmingham to use their consultation
procedures to ask for responses from people as to what they think should
happen after 7/7.

We are concerned that the government appears to be concentrating its efforts on only
talking to one community. We feel that all the communities in Birmingham
can contribute towards taking things forward.

We call for further work on interfaith activities at local level to
build upon the work done on a city wide basis by the Faith Leaders Group and
Council of Faiths. This is a challenge that can be faced by the members of
local churches, mosques, gurdwaras, temples and other religious
institutions without any need for central involvement.

We call for all responses from people as to their views to be collated and
sent to the BSP at the City Council (c/o John Hemming). The BSP will then
collate them further and pass the views of Birmingham to the government and
the wider country.

We call for the media to see the situation as an opportunity to work
towards greater tolerance and a more trusting society. We recognise that the
Birmingham media have done well on this, whilst noting that other media
outlets have not done as well.

We will come together in the future to ensure that problems are resolved
effectively and in a timely manner through communication.


A C Baker said…
Thank you.

Will there be, for example, systematic attempts to consult people who are accessing services such as full-time education, and long-term health care?
john said…
That is the intention. The BSP has no real ability to control things merely to request and influence.

Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

Statement re Police investigation into Harassment and Perverting the Course of Justice.

It was recently reported that the police were not investigating the allegations of Perverting the Course of Justice that I had made. This came as a surprise to me as I had been told for some time that my allegations were to be considered once the VRR had been rejected. I have now had a very constructive meeting with Staffordshire police on Friday 29th June 2018 and the misunderstandings have been resolved. At that meeting the evidence relating to the perversion of the course of justice and the harassment campaign against my family were discussed. The police have decided to investigate both the perversion of the course of justice and also the harassment campaign. I would like to thank them for changing their decision and I accept their apology for the way in which they did that. I am also in possession of written confirmation a police force would be investigating allegations that a vulnerable witness has been harassed for trying to expose the campaign against me. I hope that the aut…

R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

I have only just found this one which I think is accurately reported below (but if it is not please give me an accurate report).


R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

November 9 1923

Editor’s comments in bold.

Here, the magistrates’ clerk retired with the bench when they were considering a charge of dangerous driving. The clerk belonged to a firm of solicitors acting in civil proceedings for the other party to the accident. It was entirely irrelevant that there had been no evidence of actual influence brought to bear on the magistrates, and the conviction was duly quashed.

It is clear that the deputy clerk was a member of the firm of solicitors engaged in the conduct of proceedings for damages against the applicant in respect of the same collision as that which gave rise to the charge that the justices were considering. It is said, and, no doubt, truly, that when that gentleman retired in the usual way with the justices, taking with him the…