Skip to main content

Statement by the Birmingham Strategic Partnership Post 7/7 Group.

Birmingham, in common with all great cities, faces more challenges as a
consequence of the atrocities of 7/7 and attempted atrocities of 21/7.
These are challenges we need to face together so that we develop a society
based upon principles such as security and justice rather than sliding into
intolerance and conflict. In the coming years, Birmingham will continue to become a more ethnically diverse city, a fact which we should promote and be pround of. Integration, trust and respect between the various ethnic and religious communities within the city is not only desirable, but essential for Birmingham's economy to prosper. Indeed, the long term success of the city is dependent on it. We must work against polarisation and towards a tolerant, diverse society built on cooperation, trust, security and understanding.

In Birmingham we can all contribute towards the objective of a peaceful, prosperous,
secure and just society which everyone feels equally part of and whose
members views are listened to and responded to.

We call upon all the organisations in Birmingham to work together towards
these ends. At this particular time communication is the key. Whilst the BSP acknowledges the valuable contributions made by many organisations and individuals to community consultation, the BSP must re-double its efforts to hear the views of those who are not normally listened to as part of normal consultation events. Young people, women, those people who go to the gym, snooker
hall or public house, need to feel just as involved as elderly male
community leaders. The city requires consultation processes which can reach more widely than, but are entirely inclusive of, faith communities.

We call upon all organisations in Birmingham to use their consultation
procedures to ask for responses from people as to what they think should
happen after 7/7.

We are concerned that the government appears to be concentrating its efforts on only
talking to one community. We feel that all the communities in Birmingham
can contribute towards taking things forward.

We call for further work on interfaith activities at local level to
build upon the work done on a city wide basis by the Faith Leaders Group and
Council of Faiths. This is a challenge that can be faced by the members of
local churches, mosques, gurdwaras, temples and other religious
institutions without any need for central involvement.

We call for all responses from people as to their views to be collated and
sent to the BSP at the City Council (c/o John Hemming). The BSP will then
collate them further and pass the views of Birmingham to the government and
the wider country.

We call for the media to see the situation as an opportunity to work
towards greater tolerance and a more trusting society. We recognise that the
Birmingham media have done well on this, whilst noting that other media
outlets have not done as well.

We will come together in the future to ensure that problems are resolved
effectively and in a timely manner through communication.

Comments

A C Baker said…
Thank you.

Will there be, for example, systematic attempts to consult people who are accessing services such as full-time education, and long-term health care?
john said…
That is the intention. The BSP has no real ability to control things merely to request and influence.

Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

Homelessness vs Selling Books

Candidates in elections tend to find themselves very busy with lots of things to do.  It is, therefore, necessary to prioritise things to ensure that the important things are dealt with.

To me the issue of homelessness and rough sleeping is an important issue.  Therefore, when Birmingham's Faith Leaders group contacted me to ask me what I would propose and whether I would work with them to make things better I was pleased to respond with my views and indicate that I would work with them after the election.

The Faith Leaders Group (Bishops and other religious leaders in Birmingham) have now sent out their report.

Sadly, according to their report,  I was the only candidate for Yardley to respond.  The group in their report said:

"Particularly disappointing was the lack of response from some of those candidates seeking re-election as MP for their respective constituencies."
It is worth looking at the priorities of my opponent.
Interestingly today she has decided to be at th…

Millionaires and politics

The Labour Party spent most of the last election criticising me for being a successful businessman (aka millionaire). That is business in the private sector employing over 250 people. It is worth looking at the situation for the Labour Candidate now:

For the year 2016-7 Annual Income from Parliament74,962Specifically for her book51,250Other media income etc5,322.82Total declared income131,534.82

Traditionally anyone with an annual income of over £100,000 has been considered to be a millionaire. I did not use my position in parliament to increase my income.


I have been asked for sources for this. This BBC piece looks at how one should define rich. It was written in 2011 so the figures will be slightly out of date. There are perhaps 2 relevant pieces:
"In 1880 a rich person would have had £100,000 in assets or an income of £10,000 a year, he says. About a hundred people a year died leaving £100,000 and by 1910 this was 250 - "a microscopic fraction of the number of death…