Skip to main content

MG Rover / Powertrain Class Action

One interesting aspect of the situation at MG Rover is that it is arguable that anyone made redundant would have a case for Negligence against the DTI ministers that caused the downfall of the company through their briefings.

One would presume that this case would be against the DTI as a ministry.

If we look at the basic financial loss.

Each worker has probably lost £20,000 or so in redundancy.
That for the 6,000 workers is £120,000,000

Then they have lost about £10,000 on their car loans.
That's another £120,000,000 because of the fact that there are 12,000 car loans.

Then you have the dealers and the supply chain.

All in all the DTI might have to fork out around £500,000,000.

Not a nice thing for the DTI to think about.


PoliticalHack said…
So the problems of Rover are down to the DTI? Nothing to do with the fact that the money has run out, Rover aren't making cars that people want to buy and can't afford to develop new models. Any minor involvement that the DTI may or may not have had is massively less important than the performance of the Phoenix Group management - the cause that you championed a few years ago. The faultlines were there and the fracture was inevitable.
Stephen Booth said…
I remember being on a course with some people from MG Rover last year. They were very critical of the management, feeling that there was a gap between what management thought was going on and what was actually going on.

It seemed like more than the normal workers criticism of management.
john said…
The DTI pushed MG Rover into administration.

I am on record (see blog) as being critical of the Phoenix Management. I spoke to them in 2003 and was threatened with legal action by one of them.

If the Labour Party had not been so slavish we could have done a lot better on this. Labour were so happy to see the community squeezed out of the original bid that they have to accept responsibility for the situation.
Bob Piper said…
For John, life is so simple. The Labour Party is to blame for everything... for not doing anything about the piss-poor Pheonix consortium that Hemming did help to put in charge of the company so that they could bleed it dry, the fact that Rover have no originality or design in their vehicles and therefore no-one buys them, they are responsible for scaring off the Chinese,the state of the weather, the fact that John can't get elected to the Palace of varieties... just about everything in fact. Of course, the Tories, that's different, they're John's new best friends, and we all know their record as regards the deindustrialisation of Britain, the manufacturing sector in general and British Leyland in its various guises over 18 years. But John can't say anything about them because his mate Mike will throw his rattle out of the pram. John... go ahead... encourage people to litigate against the DTI... and when they lose, you can afford to pick up the tab... so offer them your very own no win-no fee service.
john said…
It would be a class action and I am sure could operate on a "no win no fee" type basis.

In any event being as it is such a large sum of money the costs would be a very small sum in comparison.

As you know I have been critical of the Tory record and of the Phoenix Management.

Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

Homelessness vs Selling Books

Candidates in elections tend to find themselves very busy with lots of things to do.  It is, therefore, necessary to prioritise things to ensure that the important things are dealt with.

To me the issue of homelessness and rough sleeping is an important issue.  Therefore, when Birmingham's Faith Leaders group contacted me to ask me what I would propose and whether I would work with them to make things better I was pleased to respond with my views and indicate that I would work with them after the election.

The Faith Leaders Group (Bishops and other religious leaders in Birmingham) have now sent out their report.

Sadly, according to their report,  I was the only candidate for Yardley to respond.  The group in their report said:

"Particularly disappointing was the lack of response from some of those candidates seeking re-election as MP for their respective constituencies."
It is worth looking at the priorities of my opponent.
Interestingly today she has decided to be at th…

Millionaires and politics

The Labour Party spent most of the last election criticising me for being a successful businessman (aka millionaire). That is business in the private sector employing over 250 people. It is worth looking at the situation for the Labour Candidate now:

For the year 2016-7 Annual Income from Parliament74,962Specifically for her book51,250Other media income etc5,322.82Total declared income131,534.82

Traditionally anyone with an annual income of over £100,000 has been considered to be a millionaire. I did not use my position in parliament to increase my income.

I have been asked for sources for this. This BBC piece looks at how one should define rich. It was written in 2011 so the figures will be slightly out of date. There are perhaps 2 relevant pieces:
"In 1880 a rich person would have had £100,000 in assets or an income of £10,000 a year, he says. About a hundred people a year died leaving £100,000 and by 1910 this was 250 - "a microscopic fraction of the number of death…