Skip to main content

Meetings

I attended three meetings today (as well as other campaigning issues).

One was a meeting at Sheldon Heath Arts College. One of the issues that came up was school dinners. It was clear that the Labour representative had no practical proposals for improving school dinners.

The next meeting was a review with parties of the plans for the election from the Returning Officer. Although things are a lot better this year, there is still a tendency to give political parties the "Mushroom treatment". We only found out today that postal votes were posted from Manchester on Tuesday and Wednesday this week - when they had assured me they would be posted on monday.

There is a clear lack of understanding of a need to provide timely information as to what is happening.

The evening hustings was about the NHS run by NHS Concern. This had some interesting elements to it. The UKIP candidate thrown out of Monday's Gay Community Hustings was allowed to argue her case at this.

I argued the case as to the damage done by rigid targets to the NHS. I think the consequences of central control of the NHS are being recognised when people cannot book appointments in advance to see GPs.

Last Night was the founding meeting for Birmingham Citizens. It was well organised and is a good sign mainly from the inner areas of Birmingham.

Comments

Stephen Booth said…
Sir,

Whilst I obviously cannot speak for all surgeries, I believe based on my experiences of several different surgeries that patients not being able to book appointments with their GP is due to too many patients for too few GP surgery hours. I am registered with the Warwick Road surgery here in Greet. According to the panel on the wall this surgery has 3 doctors, two practice nurses and a number of part time specialists (dieticians, smoking cessation counselors &c). I have never known them to have more than one doctor and one nurse in at any time, I have even known times when there has been only the nurse. From what I have seen it is rare for surgery to start anything like on time.

Since moving here five and a half years ago the only way that I have ever been able to see a doctor has been to show up at the surgery and wait for a no-show. I would try to switch to another practice but I'm told by others in the area that this is typical for this area.

Some years ago I lived in Lea Bank (now Park Central). There I was registered with a much larger practice in a medical center (if I recall correctly it was a satelitte site for one of the hospitals). There one did not make an appointment, you just showed up. Within minutes one would be seen by a triage nurse and then prioritised depending on urgency and promptly seen by a doctor. As the doctors were employees of the health centre there were typically several in and they worked a full shift rather than 45 minutes in the morning and maybe an hour in the evening. In addition to the doctors they also had a range of onsite specialists (dentists, physios, dieticians, counsellors &c) and medical students to provide support.

Given the wholesale destruction of the area, I'm not sure if the practice is still there, I hope it is.

From my own experiences it seems that large centrally controlled practices provide a better service than small independant ones.

Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

Statement re Police investigation into Harassment and Perverting the Course of Justice.

It was recently reported that the police were not investigating the allegations of Perverting the Course of Justice that I had made. This came as a surprise to me as I had been told for some time that my allegations were to be considered once the VRR had been rejected. I have now had a very constructive meeting with Staffordshire police on Friday 29th June 2018 and the misunderstandings have been resolved. At that meeting the evidence relating to the perversion of the course of justice and the harassment campaign against my family were discussed. The police have decided to investigate both the perversion of the course of justice and also the harassment campaign. I would like to thank them for changing their decision and I accept their apology for the way in which they did that. I am also in possession of written confirmation a police force would be investigating allegations that a vulnerable witness has been harassed for trying to expose the campaign against me. I hope that the aut…

R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

I have only just found this one which I think is accurately reported below (but if it is not please give me an accurate report).

KING’S BENCH DIVISION

R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

November 9 1923

Editor’s comments in bold.

Here, the magistrates’ clerk retired with the bench when they were considering a charge of dangerous driving. The clerk belonged to a firm of solicitors acting in civil proceedings for the other party to the accident. It was entirely irrelevant that there had been no evidence of actual influence brought to bear on the magistrates, and the conviction was duly quashed.

LORD HEWART CJ:
It is clear that the deputy clerk was a member of the firm of solicitors engaged in the conduct of proceedings for damages against the applicant in respect of the same collision as that which gave rise to the charge that the justices were considering. It is said, and, no doubt, truly, that when that gentleman retired in the usual way with the justices, taking with him the…