Skip to main content

NRF - Peace Breaks Out


NRF stands for Neighbourhood Renewal Fund. It is a sum of money adding up to £22 Million per year that is intended to be used for projects to assist with Birmingham (and 87 other local authorities) improving their performance on "Floor Targets".

Floor Targets are objectives defined statistically to improve certain matters (eg reduce crime, get better exam results). The theory is one that by bringing the bottom 88 authorities up we make progress throughout the country.

Most local authorities merely snaffled the money for their core budgets. There are certain rules of gamesmanship that apply to getting money from UK Government and the EU. There is a form of bureaucratic dance that occurs, but with people being very practised in the art of adjusting their projects to suit the funding the money often ends up being swallowed up for nothing.

Birmingham tried something innovative. We had spent £50K in each ward on projects identified in the ward from revenue we received when a shareholding in BHX (Birmingham International Airport) was sold. This worked well as specific projects were identified that generally delivered things.

We, therefore, set up a similar scheme for handling NRF. This means a group of residents (called the Ward Advisory Board or something similar, but often referrred to as a local strategic partnership) get together with the ward councillors identify projects and then manage the process.

The level of detail this allows would not be possible within the bureaucracy as it would not be possible to get the proper accountable scrutiny into the process.

There was one problem, however, which is that noone told us that we were supposed to be using the money to achieve the floor targets.

There is a problem. That is that there are lots of different cooks involved in cooking this particular broth. There is the Neighbourhood Renewal Unit (NRU), Government Office West Midlands (GOWM), The central City Council bureaucracy, the local City Council Bureaucracy, Councillors, MPs and Local Neighbourhood Forums. With such a large structure involving many people communications problems often occur.

This ended up in some wards such as in the Erdington Constituency where some councillors really like statues that some of the money was used or statues.

Now I have some difficulty understanding how having a statue enables the reduction of teenage pregnancies, but there may be some arcane link.

Some people got a bit stressed about this and there were lots of rows and people saying this was the wrong way to do things.

It remains that some of the schemes such as gating up rear accesses did a good and identifiable job in reducing crime etc. The point about this is that it can be shown that spending the money achieved the result. The unique thing about Birmingham's approach is that we can prove what works because we have controls (ie wards in which the same thing was not done).

Rather than identify what the real problem was and fix it people started thinking up more and more complex schemes for how to control the projects - many of which would not satisfy the financial regulations.

Finally in November GOWM wrote to the Council sort of instructing it to do things a different way. We made the point that there are projects that are running out of each year's revenue and that trying to change the system so that it runs a different way would result in all of these projects (Which employ staff) shutting down for a while.

In December this argument was accepted. A note was circulated suggesting a mechanism as to the way forward and noone has opposed it. The deadline for responses was yesterday. This enabled me to write the following article for Neighbourhood News (a publication that goes to 1,300 community activists in Birmingham).

After long discussions with various arms of government, MPs, Councillors and
with members of the Strategic Partnership some form of peace has broken out
with a consensus as to how to handle the 2005/6 allocation of NRF. It is
recognised by all that whatever the merits of the arguments for different
schemes of payment we needed to get on with year 2005/6. If we had not been
able to do that continuing projects dependent upon NRF would have
substantial problems.

The NRF allocations in 2005/6 for local spend will again be based on a Ward
allocation. The funding will be made up of a £50k Community Chest in each
Ward plus an allocation reflecting the deprivation and population to tackle
the national floor targets. In order to focus the funding on activities
which will have the biggest impact in the most deprived areas. District
Strategic Partnerships will be providing guidance on which aspects of the
national floor targets the proposed projects should be addressing and in
the mean time Wards should be developing the list of potential schemes.


This does mean that a number of people who would have lost their jobs will keep them which is good news.

The whole process does get rather bogged down in bureaucracy.

New Year's Celebrations


A minor tempest in a tea cup is going on about where the city holds its New Year's Celebrations. There is always a review after an event. I personally would prefer the event held closer to the city centre than Millenium Point as we would get higher numbers. However, no decision has been made as yet. I do generally go to the New Year's events myself and was at the one on 31st Dec 2004 - much that I have been criticised for not being there.

Plough and Harrow - Coventry Road


Another project I have been working on is getting this derelict building back into use. The good news is that yesterday there was a site visit to look at some proposals.


Comments

Anonymous said…
I guess being a millionaire means you can afford to ignore to alienate a number of folk, John. What a pity you don’t choose to spend some of your money on buying a spelling checker or, even better, fees for some literacy lessons…
Stephen Booth said…
Sir,

As someone who, as a result of the border rearrangments at the last election, found himself living in your ward, I'm curious as to where the £50k for this ward was spent.

Your most faithful constituent

Stephen
john said…
The information above relates to Financial Year 2005/6 in the main and as such none of that has as yet been committed formally, but some will by the end of the month to enable the continuation of projects.

NRF so far has been spent on a wide range of things. The Yardley District Committee met last Thursday night at 6.30pm in the Swan Library.

It allocated more of the NRF on things such as gating schemes, area clean ups and the like.

Our literature has detailed further aspects. If there is sufficient demand I could publish somewhere a complete list of NRF projects.

Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

I have only just found this one which I think is accurately reported below (but if it is not please give me an accurate report).

KING’S BENCH DIVISION

R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

November 9 1923

Editor’s comments in bold.

Here, the magistrates’ clerk retired with the bench when they were considering a charge of dangerous driving. The clerk belonged to a firm of solicitors acting in civil proceedings for the other party to the accident. It was entirely irrelevant that there had been no evidence of actual influence brought to bear on the magistrates, and the conviction was duly quashed.

LORD HEWART CJ:
It is clear that the deputy clerk was a member of the firm of solicitors engaged in the conduct of proceedings for damages against the applicant in respect of the same collision as that which gave rise to the charge that the justices were considering. It is said, and, no doubt, truly, that when that gentleman retired in the usual way with the justices, taking with him the…

Statement re Police investigation into Harassment and Perverting the Course of Justice.

It was recently reported that the police were not investigating the allegations of Perverting the Course of Justice that I had made. This came as a surprise to me as I had been told for some time that my allegations were to be considered once the VRR had been rejected. I have now had a very constructive meeting with Staffordshire police on Friday 29th June 2018 and the misunderstandings have been resolved. At that meeting the evidence relating to the perversion of the course of justice and the harassment campaign against my family were discussed. The police have decided to investigate both the perversion of the course of justice and also the harassment campaign. I would like to thank them for changing their decision and I accept their apology for the way in which they did that. I am also in possession of written confirmation a police force would be investigating allegations that a vulnerable witness has been harassed for trying to expose the campaign against me. I hope that the aut…