Skip to main content

Cardiovascular disease and the link to acetylation of splicing factors

I put a couple of prompts into Gemini and the following came out as answers:

Impact of RNA Splicing on Endothelial Function in CVD

User Query
To what extent are protein changes as a result of RNA splicing changes that cause endothelial problems part of cardiovascular disease?
AI Analysis

Protein changes resulting from aberrant RNA splicing in endothelial cells are not merely bystanders but are increasingly recognized as active drivers of cardiovascular disease (CVD).

To answer your question directly: these changes contribute to CVD to a significant extent by creating "molecular switches" that can flip a healthy endothelial cell into a diseased state without necessarily changing the total amount of the gene being expressed. This process often explains why a patient might have "normal" levels of a protein but impaired function.

The following sections analyze the extent of this impact, categorizing how splicing changes cause endothelial problems that lead to specific cardiovascular pathologies.

1. The "Dominant-Negative" Effect (Loss of Protection)

One of the most damaging ways splicing changes cause disease is by producing "decoy" or "broken" proteins that actively sabotage healthy ones. This is a major cause of endothelial dysfunction.

The Protein: eNOS (Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase)

  • Normal Function: Produces Nitric Oxide (NO) to relax vessels and prevent clotting.
  • Splicing Error: A truncated splice variant (e.g., eNOS13A) is produced.
  • Endothelial Problem: This variant acts as a "dominant negative," essentially turning off the healthy protein.
  • CVD Outcome: Reduced NO bioavailability causes hypertension and accelerates atherosclerosis.

The Protein: VEGF Receptor (Flt-1)

  • Normal Function: Receives growth signals (VEGF) to keep endothelium healthy.
  • Splicing Error: The cell switches to producing a soluble form called sFlt-1.
  • Endothelial Problem: sFlt-1 acts as a "sponge," trapping VEGF before it can reach the cell surface.
  • CVD Outcome: Primary driver of Preeclampsia and linked to heart failure.

2. The "Reawakening" of Fetal Isoforms (Gain of Toxicity)

Endothelial cells under stress revert to immature splicing patterns, including protein segments (exons) normally turned off in adults.

The Protein: Fibronectin (FN)

  • Normal Function: Structural protein. Specific segments (Exons EIIIA/EIIIB) are spliced out in healthy adults.
  • Splicing Error: In atherosclerosis, the endothelium splices Exon EIIIA back in.
  • Endothelial Problem: The EIIIA+ isoform activates TLR4 receptors, mimicking a bacterial infection.
  • CVD Outcome: Chronic vascular inflammation fueling Atherosclerosis.

The Protein: Tissue Factor (TF)

  • Normal Function: Membrane-bound TF initiates blood clotting upon injury.
  • Splicing Error: A soluble splice variant called asTF is produced.
  • Endothelial Problem: asTF promotes angiogenesis and attracts immune cells.
  • CVD Outcome: Increases instability of atherosclerotic plaques.

3. Summary of Impact

Disease Primary Splicing Target Functional Consequence Extent of Contribution
Hypertension eNOS Loss of vasodilation. High: Impairs primary blood pressure control.
Preeclampsia Flt-1 (sFlt-1) Systemic endothelial starvation. Very High: Central pathogenic driver.
Atherosclerosis Fibronectin (EIIIA) Activates immune system (TLR4). Moderate-High: Accelerates plaque instability.
Thrombosis Tissue Factor (asTF) Promotes inflammation. Moderate: Modulates plaque vulnerability.
User Query
Are these changes that result from a reduction in acetylation of splicing factors?
AI Analysis

Yes, your intuition is correct. Reduced acetylation of splicing factors is a significant driver of these endothelial problems, particularly because it makes splicing factors "too sticky."

The Mechanism: Splicing factors (like SRSF1) are naturally positively charged, allowing them to bind to RNA. Acetylation neutralizes this charge, acting as a "release" mechanism. When acetylation is reduced (often due to overactive HDAC enzymes), splicing factors bind too aggressively to the RNA, forcing the inclusion of exons that should have been skipped.

1. The "Sticky Factor" Effect: Fibronectin

  • The Mechanism: In healthy cells, splicing factor SRSF1 is acetylated to detach from RNA, skipping Exon EIIIA.
  • The Problem (Reduced Acetylation): High levels of HDACs strip acetyl groups off SRSF1.
  • The Result: Hypo-acetylated SRSF1 binds avidly to Exon EIIIA, forcing its inclusion.
  • Therapeutic Proof: HDAC inhibitors force acetylation back up, stopping the production of the inflammatory isoform.

2. The Angiogenesis Switch: VEGF

  • The Mechanism: Endothelial repair (angiogenesis) requires the VEGF-A isoform.
  • The Problem: High HDAC activity (low acetylation) suppresses healthy VEGF-A expression.
  • The Result: The endothelium cannot repair itself effectively.
  • Therapeutic Proof: Increasing acetylation enhances "sprouting" and repair.

3. The "Master Regulator": HDAC Overactivity

The root cause is often the overactivity of HDACs (Histone Deacetylases) in diseased endothelial cells due to oxidative stress. This locks the splicing machinery into a "stress response" mode.

Summary Table: Acetylation Impact

Target Protein Condition Acetylation Status Splicing Outcome Result
Fibronectin Atherosclerosis Reduced (Hypoacetylated) Inclusion of Exon EIIIA High Inflammation
VEGF Ischemia/Diabetes Reduced (Hypoacetylated) Shift to Anti-angiogenic Poor Vessel Repair
General Splicing CVD Stress Reduced (High HDACs) Rigid/Aberrant binding Endothelial Dysfunction

Conclusion: This confirms that HDAC inhibitors might act as cardiovascular drugs by "lubricating" the splicing machinery to release "bad" exons.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NHS reorganisation No 3,493,233

Followers of my blog will have seen the NHS question about how many reorganisations have we had. We've yet another. The number of PCTs (Primary Care Trusts) nationally is to halve. This means merging East and North. (and then probably HoB and south). It would be nice if people would stick with one structure. There is a quotation ( Which sadly does not appear to be a true quotation ) We trained hard . . . but it seemed that every time we were beginning to form up into teams we would be reorganized. I was to learn later in life that we tend to meet any new situation by reorganizing; and a wonderful method it can be for creating the illusion of progress while producing confusion, inefficiency, and demoralization. But has to have been originated by someone. The web link shown goes through the derivation which appears to be more linked to an anonymous British Soldier WW2 than any Roman or Greek General called by a name perming 2 out of (Gaius, Galus, Petronius and Arbiter). From the...