Skip to main content

Italian Mother: Mostyn Judgment Published (with transcript of hearing)

The judiciary have now published the judgment in respect of the Caesarean. It is here.

I remain concerned that it does not appear that she was told that this was being proposed. If it is true that she had previously elected to have a Caesarean then it sounds odd that she was not asked on this occasion, but instead driven through a legal and medical procedure in which she had no input. I remain worried about how mental capacity is removed and it does not appear that the representative of the official solicitor who was "representing her interests" actually spoke to her. One would think that if she had been asked she would have agreed given that she agreed previously. Reading between the lines of the judgment the main issue appears to have been that she did not want to give birth in England. (understandably in retrospect)

There are a number of questions about the details of the judgment. (such as what her condition actually was, whether she was being treated for the wrong disorder and the true risks of the situation) All of these issues will take some time to sort out. The wrong disorder is the most concerning as this would be the reason why she would not have been recovering (and did recover in Italy) because the treatment would have made her worse.

However, the question as to how people who are deemed "too stupid" to make decisions for themselves are treated in the process of deciding whether or not they are indeed "too stupid" (ie lack capacity) or indeed what the decision should be remains open.

Comments

Anonymous said…
http://reference.medscape.com/article/275854-overview
This lady should make an application for her Medical Records.i
AS said…
"Too stupid"????

Either you do not understand what the legal concept of capacity is, or you are deliberately misrepresenting it for your own purposes.

Either way, this comment makes it totally clear why you are not the appropriate person to be taking such a high profile role in this case.
Unknown said…
I would like to point up that although in relation to the forced cesarean Justice Mostyn has emphasized that decisions were taken only in the best interest of the mother, it seems that overall her best interest has not been taken into consideration. In fact, she was kept under care (against her will) for several weeks, and then hastily dispatched to Italy after the baby had been delivered and when she still was in very bad conditions, as the ruling of Judge Newton explicitly highlights. One has the bitter feeling that the general interest was ONLY to have the baby safely delivered without any concern for the mother.

It is also a fact that when the woman arrived to the UK she was well enough to go through a work course with an airline, and when she was back in the UK to argue her case in front of Judge Newton she had fully recovered to the point of impressing the judge. It seems that her conditions harshly deteriorated only when she was under care in the UK, thereby suggesting that the consultant psychiatrist Dr. Adimulam might have not been provided cure for the right disorder, in spite of having potential access the to woman health record through her Italian family and through Italian health care.
Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
RobJ said…
Mr Hemmings. Unfortunately you show a staggering lack of understanding of Mental Health issues, The Mental Health Act, and particularly the issue of capacity. Some of your observations are crass and insensitive bordering on just plain stupid.

Popular posts from this blog

NHS reorganisation No 3,493,233

Followers of my blog will have seen the NHS question about how many reorganisations have we had. We've yet another. The number of PCTs (Primary Care Trusts) nationally is to halve. This means merging East and North. (and then probably HoB and south). It would be nice if people would stick with one structure. There is a quotation ( Which sadly does not appear to be a true quotation ) We trained hard . . . but it seemed that every time we were beginning to form up into teams we would be reorganized. I was to learn later in life that we tend to meet any new situation by reorganizing; and a wonderful method it can be for creating the illusion of progress while producing confusion, inefficiency, and demoralization. But has to have been originated by someone. The web link shown goes through the derivation which appears to be more linked to an anonymous British Soldier WW2 than any Roman or Greek General called by a name perming 2 out of (Gaius, Galus, Petronius and Arbiter). From the...