Skip to main content

Suing Twitter and CTB

Well, well, well I didn't think that CTB could be that stupid. 2 million people have seen the Twitter account. Over 116,000 have subscribed to it. Twitter have highlighted it.

Now CTB has decided to sue Twitter to get the account details.

All they can get is the Internet Protocol address unless someone has been stupid enough to use their normal email address.

This could be the address of an internet cafe. All of the computers in parliament on the parliamentary network have the same external IP address.

Hence it is a bit difficult to pin down the person who posted the details even if twitter divvy up the information.

What it has done, however, is to send the information global (apart from in the UK).

Something that very few people are actually bothered about has now got the maximum promotion.

I have said for some time that getting the injunction is often worse than that which it is supposed to conceal.

What it does do, however, is make this particular case sub judice and hence not subject to comment in parliament. I don't think that was the key objective, however.

Comments

A. Lee Firth said…
What a farce!

This footballer is an idiot; he's just drawn a lot more attention to himself.

For the last week or so I've been searching the internet and re-posting links to the details about the various injunctions and have suffered no unpleasant consequences.
Construction said…
Hemmings you are a tool. The player has a right to privacy if that is what the court grants him. It is called rule of law.. MPs like yourself are quick to pontificate on minor issues yet strangely silent on the stuff that matters. Arrogant self-serving doughnut. The irony of you espousing freedom of speech yet you moderate your blog!
moira said…
Construction-you dont know what you are talking about. People who have lost their children through a corrupt family court system are not allowed to speak out and can be imprisoned without a trial. Hardly a minor issue.Gagging leads to more gagging.

These injunctions are slowly creeping in and soon we will be like Russia etc
moira said…
Construction-you dont know what you are talking about. People who have lost their children through a corrupt family court system are not allowed to speak out and can be imprisoned without a trial. Hardly a minor issue.Gagging leads to more gagging.

These injunctions are slowly creeping in and soon we will be like Russia etc
moira said…
Leads to this ridiculous chief spending valuable tax payers money which could be used for the public

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1389014/Controversial-council-chief-spent-400-000-gagging-orders-silence-ex-staff.html

Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

Homelessness vs Selling Books

Candidates in elections tend to find themselves very busy with lots of things to do.  It is, therefore, necessary to prioritise things to ensure that the important things are dealt with.

To me the issue of homelessness and rough sleeping is an important issue.  Therefore, when Birmingham's Faith Leaders group contacted me to ask me what I would propose and whether I would work with them to make things better I was pleased to respond with my views and indicate that I would work with them after the election.

The Faith Leaders Group (Bishops and other religious leaders in Birmingham) have now sent out their report.

Sadly, according to their report,  I was the only candidate for Yardley to respond.  The group in their report said:

"Particularly disappointing was the lack of response from some of those candidates seeking re-election as MP for their respective constituencies."
It is worth looking at the priorities of my opponent.
Interestingly today she has decided to be at th…

Millionaires and politics

The Labour Party spent most of the last election criticising me for being a successful businessman (aka millionaire). That is business in the private sector employing over 250 people. It is worth looking at the situation for the Labour Candidate now:

For the year 2016-7 Annual Income from Parliament74,962Specifically for her book51,250Other media income etc5,322.82Total declared income131,534.82

Traditionally anyone with an annual income of over £100,000 has been considered to be a millionaire. I did not use my position in parliament to increase my income.


I have been asked for sources for this. This BBC piece looks at how one should define rich. It was written in 2011 so the figures will be slightly out of date. There are perhaps 2 relevant pieces:
"In 1880 a rich person would have had £100,000 in assets or an income of £10,000 a year, he says. About a hundred people a year died leaving £100,000 and by 1910 this was 250 - "a microscopic fraction of the number of death…