Skip to main content

David Cameron's comments on Council Housing

I am not that happy about his comments about council housing. There is a complex issue about housing and how we manage a spectrum of different types of tenancies and ownerships.

Housing is a very important foundation for families. People with disabilities often have their properties specifically adapted.

I think it is important to give people some security. I am actually unhappy about forcibly removing people from their homes for under occupation although I reocgnise that we should encourage people to downsize.

The local housing allowance scheme does encourage people to downsize when they don't need such a large property.

This is an area where considerable discussion is needed before putting proposals forward in legislation.

Comments

Jerry said…
While the Comment by David Cameron leaves a lump in many peoples throats, I guess theres one good thing to come out of it and thats People are talking and debating about the subject.

There's not enough council houses available, the waiting lists are longer than the terms in government.

David Cameron was way out of tune in his remarks but hey lets not sit here and moan about them, get the subject into a real debate and work at solving the issues.

Where was this subjecty in the party manifesto, (either parties) or even on the Coalition aggreement..........

I am glad this topic has been aired, not the best start to do it but at least the subject has gained some momentum.

One last thing, David Cameron needs to fire his advisors, he made a muck up about Pakistan, now he's moo poo'ed up again by shouting the odds on his home soil, think before he speaks would be a good start
Nearly Legal said…
John, LHA is not relevant for local authority secure tenancies, or most RSL assured tenancies, which are Cameron's target here.

Aside from that, and as a housing solciitor, I agree.
john said…
I am aware that LHA does not currently affect RSL tenancies.
moira said…
It says we will need to build £1000,000 houses every year for 25 years to meet expanding population. How is this to be done?

Popular posts from this blog

Millionaires and politics

The Labour Party spent most of the last election criticising me for being a successful businessman (aka millionaire). That is business in the private sector employing over 250 people. It is worth looking at the situation for the Labour Candidate now:

For the year 2016-7 Annual Income from Parliament74,962Specifically for her book51,250Other media income etc5,322.82Total declared income131,534.82

Traditionally anyone with an annual income of over £100,000 has been considered to be a millionaire. I did not use my position in parliament to increase my income.


I have been asked for sources for this. This BBC piece looks at how one should define rich. It was written in 2011 so the figures will be slightly out of date. There are perhaps 2 relevant pieces:
"In 1880 a rich person would have had £100,000 in assets or an income of £10,000 a year, he says. About a hundred people a year died leaving £100,000 and by 1910 this was 250 - "a microscopic fraction of the number of death…

Homelessness vs Selling Books

Candidates in elections tend to find themselves very busy with lots of things to do.  It is, therefore, necessary to prioritise things to ensure that the important things are dealt with.

To me the issue of homelessness and rough sleeping is an important issue.  Therefore, when Birmingham's Faith Leaders group contacted me to ask me what I would propose and whether I would work with them to make things better I was pleased to respond with my views and indicate that I would work with them after the election.

The Faith Leaders Group (Bishops and other religious leaders in Birmingham) have now sent out their report.

Sadly, according to their report,  I was the only candidate for Yardley to respond.  The group in their report said:

"Particularly disappointing was the lack of response from some of those candidates seeking re-election as MP for their respective constituencies."
It is worth looking at the priorities of my opponent.
Interestingly today she has decided to be at th…

Gender Issues comparison of candidates

John Hemming believes that an MP should represent everyone in their constituency.  This should be regardless of their race, religion, gender, abledness, sexual orientation or anything else.  It should be everyone.

When he was an MP he worked on issues relating to men, those relating to women and those relating to non-binary people. Everyone.

For example here is John Hemming on a demonstration outside the courts with the campaign group Women Against Rape (it related to the case of a mother who had her child removed from her because the mother was raped).




Jess Phillips, who campaigns on women's issues, notwithstanding the questions asked about her appointments in her parliamentary office, had the following response when asked for a debate on issues specifically relating to men: