Skip to main content

Couple took cash for 'loaning adopted girls to paedophiles'

This sort of story reported in the Daily Mail makes one wonder about the reliability of the assessment processes used by local authorities.

Whether there will be a serious case review or not is unclear. I think there should be some inquiry.


Jerry said…
Whether or not there will be a serious case review surrounding this is not known, I would say that the case its self leaves many more unanswered questions.

Were the children "forcefully" adopted? one big question we will never probably know?

Will the birth parents ever find out?

Why did these people be able to slip through a system enshrined in strict policy and procedures?

The biggest question that will need answering here is what will happen to the poor children.

More so what happens if these children decide to search for their birth parents when they are older, will the authorities prevent this tooth an nail in order to cover the horrendous act from the birth parents.

Could you imagine if it was your own children that this happened too, the forced adoption and the horrendous acts that followed. what would you do...............
moira said…
My adoption was not properly screened in the 70's. Both parents had emotional problems and the child psychiatrist described my adoption as a severely disturbed background. Father didnt want to adopt but social services didnt think it necessary to ask probing questions or do medical assessments or checks on their own childhoods.

The problem is if you are damaged by these adoptions then social services become involved in your own family.Even if you do well social services seem to enjoy being vindictive to people who have been in their system. They are very harsh. My solicitor said that ss said in a case that a woman fought against her getting her child back because she had been in care and they made the point their care isnt very good. Its all sick and so hypocritical. In some cases SS can be become persecutory like in mine and you have to have other profs tell them to leave you alone as "she is an excellent mother". They just pick on what they think are vulnerable targets. I hate them and thats sad to say about an organisation who frequently boast they support families and keep them together. its very rare I hear that happen.The support is absent or abysmal.

Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

Homelessness vs Selling Books

Candidates in elections tend to find themselves very busy with lots of things to do.  It is, therefore, necessary to prioritise things to ensure that the important things are dealt with.

To me the issue of homelessness and rough sleeping is an important issue.  Therefore, when Birmingham's Faith Leaders group contacted me to ask me what I would propose and whether I would work with them to make things better I was pleased to respond with my views and indicate that I would work with them after the election.

The Faith Leaders Group (Bishops and other religious leaders in Birmingham) have now sent out their report.

Sadly, according to their report,  I was the only candidate for Yardley to respond.  The group in their report said:

"Particularly disappointing was the lack of response from some of those candidates seeking re-election as MP for their respective constituencies."
It is worth looking at the priorities of my opponent.
Interestingly today she has decided to be at th…

Millionaires and politics

The Labour Party spent most of the last election criticising me for being a successful businessman (aka millionaire). That is business in the private sector employing over 250 people. It is worth looking at the situation for the Labour Candidate now:

For the year 2016-7 Annual Income from Parliament74,962Specifically for her book51,250Other media income etc5,322.82Total declared income131,534.82

Traditionally anyone with an annual income of over £100,000 has been considered to be a millionaire. I did not use my position in parliament to increase my income.

I have been asked for sources for this. This BBC piece looks at how one should define rich. It was written in 2011 so the figures will be slightly out of date. There are perhaps 2 relevant pieces:
"In 1880 a rich person would have had £100,000 in assets or an income of £10,000 a year, he says. About a hundred people a year died leaving £100,000 and by 1910 this was 250 - "a microscopic fraction of the number of death…