Skip to main content

Retention Swing vs Universal Swing (Lib Dem Surge)

It does appear that the traditional UNS methodology for seat projections cannot cope with a Lib Dem surge.

I have done some calculations on a retention swing. That is a calcalation on the basis that in each seat the national transfer of votes is replicated. However, if Labour have lost a third of their votes nationally they lose a third of their votes that were cast previously in each seat rather than the same percentage of the total vote in each seat.

This is a more complex calculation, but it produces more reliable results.

It needs more work, but a first cut of the data is available here

Comments

Prospero said…
It says a lot for the inadequacy of our "democratic" system that with a 33% (the largest fraction) of the vote the LibDems would still only end up with 164 seats - just over 25% of the total. Roll on electoral reform. . .
Prospero said…
It says a lot about our "democratic" system when the LibDems with 33% (the largest fraction) of the vote end up with only 164 seats - a little more than 25% of the total. Roll on electoral reform...
Joe Otten said…
Not sure about that model either.

What I think is needed is to apply swings to some monotonic function of votes, that results in behaviour like uniform swings at low swings, and like proportional swings at high swings. If that makes sense.

Popular posts from this blog

NHS reorganisation No 3,493,233

Followers of my blog will have seen the NHS question about how many reorganisations have we had. We've yet another. The number of PCTs (Primary Care Trusts) nationally is to halve. This means merging East and North. (and then probably HoB and south). It would be nice if people would stick with one structure. There is a quotation ( Which sadly does not appear to be a true quotation ) We trained hard . . . but it seemed that every time we were beginning to form up into teams we would be reorganized. I was to learn later in life that we tend to meet any new situation by reorganizing; and a wonderful method it can be for creating the illusion of progress while producing confusion, inefficiency, and demoralization. But has to have been originated by someone. The web link shown goes through the derivation which appears to be more linked to an anonymous British Soldier WW2 than any Roman or Greek General called by a name perming 2 out of (Gaius, Galus, Petronius and Arbiter). From the...