Skip to main content

Election Results 15th October 2009

Barnsley MBC, St. Helen's
Lab 1520 (59.8; +2.2)
BNP 590 (23.2; +6.6)
Barnsley Independent Group 171 (6.7; -11.9)
UKIP 94 (3.7; +3.7)
Con 89 (3.5; -3.6)
LD Eddie Gouthwaite 78 (3.1; +3.1)
Majority 930
Turnout 31%
Lab hold
Percentage change is since May 2007.

Basingstoke and Deane BC, Chineham
Con 898 (63.0; +19.1)
LD Liam Anthony Elvish 249 (17.5; +7.7)
Ind 163 / 18 (12.7; -28.2)
Lab 98 (6.9; +1.4)
Majority 649
Turnout not known
Con hold
Percentage change is since May 2008.
Party defending seat: Con. Cause: Resignation.

Bracknell Forest BC, Hanworth
Con 640 (42.4; -14.2)
Lab 377 (25.0; -1.9)
LD Larraine de Laune 206 (13.7; +13.7)
UKIP 139 (9.2; +9.2)
Green 77 (5.1; -11.3)
BNP 70 (4.6; +4.6)
Majority 263
Turnout 23.4%
Con hold
Percentage change is since May 2007.
Party defending seat: Con. Cause: Death.

Cannock Chase DC, Heath Hayes East and Wimblebury
LD Chris Collis 314 (30.0; +8.2)
Con 300 (28.6; -10.9)
Lab 267 (25.5; -0.1)
BNP 116 (11.1; +11.1)
UKIP 51 (4.9; +4.9)
[Others (0.0; -13.1)]
Majority 14
Turnout 21%
LD gain from Lab
Percentage change is since May 2008
Party defending seat: Lab. Cause: Resignation.

Crawley BC, Northgate
Lab 527 (43.3; +19.0)
Con 446 (36.7; +18.9)
LD Darren Wise 230 (18.9; -26.6)
(Others) Justice Party 13 (1.1; -8.4)
[Green (0.0; -3.0)]
Majority 81
Turnout 31.25%
Lab gain from LD
Percentage change is since May 2007.
Party defending seat: LD. Cause: Resignation.

Hammersmith and Fulham LBC, Town
Con 970 (63.4; +0.8)
LD Paul Kennedy 289 (18.9; +2.8)
Lab 271 (17.7; -3.6)
Majority 681
Turnout 20.3%
Con hold
Percentage change is since May 2006.
Party defending seat: Con. Cause: Death.

Lincolnshire CC, Boston North West
Con 597 (38.7; +13.2)
BNP 581 (37.7; +17.1)
Lab 204 (13.2; +1.9)
LD Mike Sheridan-Shinn 160 (10.4; +3.2)
[Others (0.0; -35.5)]
Majority 16
Turnout 21.3%
Con hold
Percentage change is since June 2009.
Party defending seat: Con. Cause: Disqualification.

North Norfolk DC, The Runtons
Con 524 (52.1; +1.9)
LD Lucinda Starling 454 (45.1; -4.7)
Green 14 (1.4; +1.4)
Lab 14 (1.4; +1.4)
Majority 70
Turnout 55.93%
Con hold
Percentage change is since May 2007
Party defending seat: Con. Cause: Resignation.

Richmondshire DC, Hipswell
Con 144 (39.0; +1.2)
LD Ann Bagley 126 (34.1; +8.9)
Ind 99 (26.8; -10.1)
Majority 18
Turnout 12.52%
Con hold
Percentage change is since May 2007.
Party defending seat: Con. Cause: Resignation.

Richmondshire DC, Middleham
Con 253 (85.5; +10.0)
LD Gina Ramsbottom 43 (14.5; -10.0)
Majority 210
Turnout 27.9%
Con hold
Percentage change is since May 2007.
Party defending seat: Con. Cause: Resignation.

South Ribble BC, Leyland St Mary's
Con 709 (74.9; +6.3)
Lab 237 (25.1; +6.1)
[LD (0.0; -12.5)]
Majority 472
Turnout not known
Con hold
Percentage change is since May 2007.
Party defending seat: Con. Cause: Resignation.

Taunton Deane BC, Lyngford
LD Nicci Court 523 (51.0; +6.6)
Con 274 (26.7; -1.2)
Lab 164 (16.0; -11.6)
UKIP 64 (6.2; +6.2)
Majority 249
Turnout 25.51%
LD hold
Percentage change is since May 2007
Party defending seat: LD. Cause: Resignation.

Tetbury TC,
Ind 455 (33.4)
LD Colin Horton 360 (26.4)
Con 321 / 317 (23.6)
Ind 226 (16.6)
Majorities 134 / 39
Turnout not known
Ind hold x 1. LD gain from Ind x 1.
Party defending seats: Ind. Cause: Resignation x 2.

Comments

anonadoptee said…
Hi John

I don't know if you have seen this story? (also covered here)

I know you have supported other women in similar situations so I was wondering if you knew what we could do about this? Or if you could contact a support network that could help her.

Thanks
john said…
We are aware of this and efforts are being made to contact the family. This is a scottish case, however, and JFF concentrates on England and Wales.

Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

Statement re Police investigation into Harassment and Perverting the Course of Justice.

It was recently reported that the police were not investigating the allegations of Perverting the Course of Justice that I had made. This came as a surprise to me as I had been told for some time that my allegations were to be considered once the VRR had been rejected. I have now had a very constructive meeting with Staffordshire police on Friday 29th June 2018 and the misunderstandings have been resolved. At that meeting the evidence relating to the perversion of the course of justice and the harassment campaign against my family were discussed. The police have decided to investigate both the perversion of the course of justice and also the harassment campaign. I would like to thank them for changing their decision and I accept their apology for the way in which they did that. I am also in possession of written confirmation a police force would be investigating allegations that a vulnerable witness has been harassed for trying to expose the campaign against me. I hope that the aut…

R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

I have only just found this one which I think is accurately reported below (but if it is not please give me an accurate report).

KING’S BENCH DIVISION

R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

November 9 1923

Editor’s comments in bold.

Here, the magistrates’ clerk retired with the bench when they were considering a charge of dangerous driving. The clerk belonged to a firm of solicitors acting in civil proceedings for the other party to the accident. It was entirely irrelevant that there had been no evidence of actual influence brought to bear on the magistrates, and the conviction was duly quashed.

LORD HEWART CJ:
It is clear that the deputy clerk was a member of the firm of solicitors engaged in the conduct of proceedings for damages against the applicant in respect of the same collision as that which gave rise to the charge that the justices were considering. It is said, and, no doubt, truly, that when that gentleman retired in the usual way with the justices, taking with him the…