Skip to main content

Election Results 3rd September 2009

Medway UA, Luton & Wayfield
Con 1042 (36.9; +10.8)
Lab 1038 (36.7; -12.3)
LD Gary Allanach 223 (7.9; +7.9)
UKIP 200 (7.1; +7.1)
BNP 186 (6.6; +6.6)
Ind 87 (3.1; -21.9)
Green 51 (1.8; +1.8)
Majority 4
Turnout 29.78%
Con gain from Lab
Percentage change is since May 2007

Wiltshire UA, Southwick
Ind 385 (37.2; +37.2)
LD Gordon King 315 (30.5; -8.8)
Con 273 (26.4; -34.3)
UKIP 61 (5.9; +5.9)
Majority 70
Turnout 30.66%
Ind gain from Con
Percentage change is since June 2009

Plymouth City UA, Ham
Lab 1243 (44.0; +2.7)
Con 676 (23.9; -15.7)
UKIP 442 (15.6; +15.6)
BNP 82 (2.9; +2.9)
Ind 204 (7.2; +7.2)
LD Rebecca Trimnell 181 (6.4; -6.8)
[Green (0.0; -5.9)]
Majority 567
Turnout 29%
Lab hold
Percentage change is since May 2008

Stamford TC, St Georges
Ind 243 (42.4)
Con 135 (23.6)
LD Raymond Donald Lee 115 (20.1)
No Description 80 (14.0)
Majority 108
Turnout 17.7%
Ind hold

Party defending seat: Ind. Cause: Death.

Oswestry TC, Castle
Con 214 (61.3)
LD Brain L Willis 135 (38.7)
Majority 79
Turnout 15.46%
Con hold

Malvern Hills DC, Hallow
LD Dean Clarke 504 (61.6; +16.5)
Con 314 (38.4; -16.5)
Majority 190
Turnout not known
LD gain from Con
Percentage change is since May 2007

Melksham TC, Melksham Spa
LD Peter Dauncey 732 (58.8)
Con 432 (34.7)
BNP 81 (6.5)
Majority 300
Turnout 26%
LD gain from Con
Party defending seat: Con. Cause: Resignation.

Chippenham TC, Chippenham Park
LD Lorraine Roberts-Rance 427 (66.4)
Con 216 (33.6)
Majority 211
Turnout 30.03%
LD hold
Party defending seat: LD. Cause: Resignation.

Wootton Bassett TC, North
LD Stephen Richard Walls 423 (56.0)
Con 333 (44.0)
Majority 90
Turnout 22%
LD gain from Con
Part defending seat: Con. Cause: Disqualification.

Calne TC, Quemerford
Con 299 (53.9)
LD Sally Ann Chandler 256 (46.1)
Majority 43
Turnout 29.8%
Con hold
Party defending seat: Con. Cause: Resignation.


Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

Statement re Police investigation into Harassment and Perverting the Course of Justice.

It was recently reported that the police were not investigating the allegations of Perverting the Course of Justice that I had made. This came as a surprise to me as I had been told for some time that my allegations were to be considered once the VRR had been rejected. I have now had a very constructive meeting with Staffordshire police on Friday 29th June 2018 and the misunderstandings have been resolved. At that meeting the evidence relating to the perversion of the course of justice and the harassment campaign against my family were discussed. The police have decided to investigate both the perversion of the course of justice and also the harassment campaign. I would like to thank them for changing their decision and I accept their apology for the way in which they did that. I am also in possession of written confirmation a police force would be investigating allegations that a vulnerable witness has been harassed for trying to expose the campaign against me. I hope that the aut…

R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

I have only just found this one which I think is accurately reported below (but if it is not please give me an accurate report).


R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

November 9 1923

Editor’s comments in bold.

Here, the magistrates’ clerk retired with the bench when they were considering a charge of dangerous driving. The clerk belonged to a firm of solicitors acting in civil proceedings for the other party to the accident. It was entirely irrelevant that there had been no evidence of actual influence brought to bear on the magistrates, and the conviction was duly quashed.

It is clear that the deputy clerk was a member of the firm of solicitors engaged in the conduct of proceedings for damages against the applicant in respect of the same collision as that which gave rise to the charge that the justices were considering. It is said, and, no doubt, truly, that when that gentleman retired in the usual way with the justices, taking with him the…