Skip to main content

Election Results: 17th September 2009

Buckinghamshire CC, Amersham
Conservative 1840 (46.6; -3.7)
Lib Dem Davida Allen 1768 (44.8; 0.0)
UKIP 140 (3.5; +3.5)
Labour 106 (2.7, -2.2)
Green 95 (2.4; +2.4)

Conservative HOLD
Majority 72
Turnout 30.6

Newark and Sherwood DC, Beacon
Conservative 413 (48.2; - 0.7)
Lib Dem Decland Logue 296 (34.7; +7.8)
Labour 147 (17.2; -7.1)

Consvative HOLD
Majority 117
Turnout 16.6

Nottinghamshire CC, Newark East
Conservative 517 (45.2; -6.4)
Lib Dem Chris Harrison 322 (28.1; - 2.3)
Labour 198 (17.3; -0.7)
UKIP 107 (9.4; +9.4)

Conservative HOLD
Majority 195
Turnout 15.6

Birmingham City MBC, Sparkbrook
Respect 2495 (39.6; -7.0)
Labour 2228 (35.4; -1.3)
Conservative 799 (12.7; +7.5)
Lib Dem Maeem Quarefhi 506 (8.0; +1.5)
Green 213 (3.4 +3.4)
Independent 55 (0.9 +0.9)
BNP 0 (0; -1.5)

Turnout 32.3
Majority 267
Respect HOLD

Redcar and Cleveland UA, South Bank
Labour 442 (43.6; -6.9)
Lib Dem Steven Abbot 354 (34.9; +25.1)
Ind 102 (10.1; -5.0)
UKIP 69 (6.8; +6.8)
Conservative 47 (4.6; -5.7)
BNP 0 (0; -14.4)

Labour HOLD
Majority 88
Turnout 21.2

Cotswold DC, Water Park
Liberal Democrat Esmond Jenkins 894 (71.7; +31.5)
Con 353 (28.3; -31.5)
Lib Dem HOLD
Majority 541
Turnout 28.3

Amber Valley BC, Ripley and Marehay
Labour 585 (52.4)
Conservative 531 (47.6)
Labour HOLD
Majority 54
Turnout 24.1

Rustington PC, West Rustington
Ind 661 (61.9)
Lib Dem Jamie Bennett 406 (38.1)

Independent GAIN from Conservative

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

Homelessness vs Selling Books

Candidates in elections tend to find themselves very busy with lots of things to do.  It is, therefore, necessary to prioritise things to ensure that the important things are dealt with.

To me the issue of homelessness and rough sleeping is an important issue.  Therefore, when Birmingham's Faith Leaders group contacted me to ask me what I would propose and whether I would work with them to make things better I was pleased to respond with my views and indicate that I would work with them after the election.

The Faith Leaders Group (Bishops and other religious leaders in Birmingham) have now sent out their report.

Sadly, according to their report,  I was the only candidate for Yardley to respond.  The group in their report said:

"Particularly disappointing was the lack of response from some of those candidates seeking re-election as MP for their respective constituencies."
It is worth looking at the priorities of my opponent.
Interestingly today she has decided to be at th…

Millionaires and politics

The Labour Party spent most of the last election criticising me for being a successful businessman (aka millionaire). That is business in the private sector employing over 250 people. It is worth looking at the situation for the Labour Candidate now:

For the year 2016-7 Annual Income from Parliament74,962Specifically for her book51,250Other media income etc5,322.82Total declared income131,534.82

Traditionally anyone with an annual income of over £100,000 has been considered to be a millionaire. I did not use my position in parliament to increase my income.


I have been asked for sources for this. This BBC piece looks at how one should define rich. It was written in 2011 so the figures will be slightly out of date. There are perhaps 2 relevant pieces:
"In 1880 a rich person would have had £100,000 in assets or an income of £10,000 a year, he says. About a hundred people a year died leaving £100,000 and by 1910 this was 250 - "a microscopic fraction of the number of death…