Skip to main content

EDM 1545 in Session 6-7

That EDM relates to opposing the attempts to exempt MPs expenses from FoI.

That this House notes the Third Reading of the Freedom of Information (Amendment) Bill on 18th May; believes that it is inconsistent and unprincipled to seek to exempt the affairs of the House of Commons and House of Lords from the obligations of the Freedom of Information legislation, which applies to all other public authorities and only took effect in 2005; believes that the passage into law of the Freedom of Information (Amendment) Bill would fundamentally undermine respect for both Houses of Parliament, all the Houses' hon. Members and officers, and most importantly Parliament's ability to have any authority or set any example on issues of accountability, openness or transparency in Government and public life; and believes that the argument that more laws are needed to protect confidentiality of correspondence between hon. Members and those whom they represent is not made out on the evidence, should only be introduced if careful and considered advice confirms an agreed need for changes to the law, and should not be used as an excuse, justification or distraction for a major attack on the rights of British citizens to hold to account all hon. Members of Parliament passing laws in their name.


Conservative Party
Shepherd, Richard
Open: 1 Closed: 0
Labour Party
Corbyn, Jeremy
Devine, Jim
Dobbin, Jim
Fisher, Mark
Hopkins, Kelvin
Jackson, Glenda
Jones, Lynne
Open: 7 Closed: 0
Liberal Democrats
Alexander, Danny
Baker, Norman
Barrett, John
Beith, Alan
Brake, Tom
Breed, Colin
Brooke, Annette
Browne, Jeremy
Bruce, Malcolm
Burstow, Paul
Burt, Lorely
Cable, Vincent
Carmichael, Alistair
Clegg, Nick
Davey, Edward
Farron, Timothy
Featherstone, Lynne
Foster, Don
George, Andrew
Goldsworthy, Julia
Hancock, Mike
Harris, Evan
Heath, David
Hemming, John
Holmes, Paul
Horwood, Martin
Howarth, David
Hughes, Simon
Huhne, Chris
Hunter, Mark
Keetch, Paul
Kennedy, Charles
Kramer, Susan
Lamb, Norman
Laws, David
Leech, John
Moore, Michael
Mulholland, Greg
Oaten, Mark
Opik, Lembit
Pugh, John
Reid, Alan
Rennie, Willie
Rogerson, Daniel
Rowen, Paul
Sanders, Adrian
Smith, Robert
Stunell, Andrew
Swinson, Jo
Taylor, Matthew
Teather, Sarah
Webb, Steve
Williams, Mark
Williams, Roger
Williams, Stephen
Willis, Phil
Willott, Jenny
Open: 57 Closed: 0
Plaid Cymru
Llwyd, Elfyn
Williams, Hywel
Open: 2 Closed: 0
Respect
Galloway, George
Open: 1 Closed: 0
Scottish National Party
MacNeil, Angus
Open: 1 Closed: 0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
McDonnell, Alasdair
McGrady, Eddie
Open: 2 Closed: 0
Ulster Unionist Party
Hermon, Lady

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

Statement re Police investigation into Harassment and Perverting the Course of Justice.

It was recently reported that the police were not investigating the allegations of Perverting the Course of Justice that I had made. This came as a surprise to me as I had been told for some time that my allegations were to be considered once the VRR had been rejected. I have now had a very constructive meeting with Staffordshire police on Friday 29th June 2018 and the misunderstandings have been resolved. At that meeting the evidence relating to the perversion of the course of justice and the harassment campaign against my family were discussed. The police have decided to investigate both the perversion of the course of justice and also the harassment campaign. I would like to thank them for changing their decision and I accept their apology for the way in which they did that. I am also in possession of written confirmation a police force would be investigating allegations that a vulnerable witness has been harassed for trying to expose the campaign against me. I hope that the aut…

R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

I have only just found this one which I think is accurately reported below (but if it is not please give me an accurate report).

KING’S BENCH DIVISION

R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

November 9 1923

Editor’s comments in bold.

Here, the magistrates’ clerk retired with the bench when they were considering a charge of dangerous driving. The clerk belonged to a firm of solicitors acting in civil proceedings for the other party to the accident. It was entirely irrelevant that there had been no evidence of actual influence brought to bear on the magistrates, and the conviction was duly quashed.

LORD HEWART CJ:
It is clear that the deputy clerk was a member of the firm of solicitors engaged in the conduct of proceedings for damages against the applicant in respect of the same collision as that which gave rise to the charge that the justices were considering. It is said, and, no doubt, truly, that when that gentleman retired in the usual way with the justices, taking with him the…