Skip to main content

Results: Thursday 12th February 2009.

Cannock Chase DC, Cannock West
Con 654 (60.6; -14.1)
Lab 333 (30.8; +5.5)
LD Susan Wells 93 (8.6; +8.6)
Majority 321
Turnout 19.4%
Con hold
Percentage change is since May 2008

Croydon LBC, Waddon
Con 1462 (46.0; +2.7)
Lab 1222 (38.5; +0.7)
BNP 157 (4.9; +4.9)
LD Patricia Gauge 150 (4.7; -2.7)
Green 115 (3.6; -5.4)
UKIP 48 (1.5; +1.5)
The Peoples’ Choice Exclusively For All 13 (0.4; +0.4)
The Monster Raving Loony Party 11 (0.3; +0.3)
[Pensions Action Alliance (0.0; -2.5)]
Majority 240
Turnout 28.6%
Con hold
Percentage change is since May 2006

Enfield LBC, Jubilee
Lab 1346 (51.3; +7.8)
Con 1049 (40.0; -3.4)
LD Dawn Barnes 69 (2.6; +2.6)
Green 60 (2.3; -10.9)
UKIP 59 (2.2; +2.2)
Ind 41 (1.6; +1.6)
Majority 297
Turnout 29.2%
Lab gain from Con
Percentage change is since May 2006

South Northamptonshire DC, Grange Park
Con 407 (76.1; -23.9)
LD Shaun Hope 128 (23.9; +23.9)
Majority 279
Turnout 19.2%
Con hold
Percentage change is since May 2007

Bishop’s Stortford TC, Central
Con 540 (47.4)
LD Andrew Lewin 358 (31.4)
Lab 165 (14.5)
Green 76 (6.7)
Majority 182
Turnout 15.5%
Con gain from LD

Sodbury TC, North East Town
LD Paul Jobbin 342 (52.9)
Con 274 (42.4)
Green 30 (4.6)
Majority 68
Turnout 37.0%
LD gain from Con


Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

I have only just found this one which I think is accurately reported below (but if it is not please give me an accurate report).


R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

November 9 1923

Editor’s comments in bold.

Here, the magistrates’ clerk retired with the bench when they were considering a charge of dangerous driving. The clerk belonged to a firm of solicitors acting in civil proceedings for the other party to the accident. It was entirely irrelevant that there had been no evidence of actual influence brought to bear on the magistrates, and the conviction was duly quashed.

It is clear that the deputy clerk was a member of the firm of solicitors engaged in the conduct of proceedings for damages against the applicant in respect of the same collision as that which gave rise to the charge that the justices were considering. It is said, and, no doubt, truly, that when that gentleman retired in the usual way with the justices, taking with him the…

Statement re Police investigation into Harassment and Perverting the Course of Justice.

It was recently reported that the police were not investigating the allegations of Perverting the Course of Justice that I had made. This came as a surprise to me as I had been told for some time that my allegations were to be considered once the VRR had been rejected. I have now had a very constructive meeting with Staffordshire police on Friday 29th June 2018 and the misunderstandings have been resolved. At that meeting the evidence relating to the perversion of the course of justice and the harassment campaign against my family were discussed. The police have decided to investigate both the perversion of the course of justice and also the harassment campaign. I would like to thank them for changing their decision and I accept their apology for the way in which they did that. I am also in possession of written confirmation a police force would be investigating allegations that a vulnerable witness has been harassed for trying to expose the campaign against me. I hope that the aut…