Skip to main content

Capacity to Litigate

The abuse of the provisions relating to the "capacity to instruct" a solicitor continues in the Family Division. It appears now that this is a special trick used by some social workers and legal departments to prevent people from fighting the system.

Comments

jacquig said…
I don't understand why you say this is a special trick? Lawyers have no professional choice when someone does not seem to have the competence to instruct. The client has to be assessed by a Psychiatrist - though sometimes a GP is accepted. It is right to say that if someone is deemed incompetent they are likely to lose the case - if too incapacitated to instruct the parent is unlikely to be able to parent. And most of the time if parents are at that level they really cannot safely parent unless they are properly supported - which they often are not and this is the shame which I would suggest needs addressing. It would help to know what sort of trick you are talking about.

Jacquig
John Hemming said…
This is, of course, the question as to whether or not someone is really incapable.
Unknown said…
I don't understand why you say this is a special trick?

I have seen first hand at least two people who are supposedly “incapacitated” yet they know exactly what the case is about & talk about the case with great insight, therefore can obviously instruct a solicitor, it really is not up to a psychologist to say otherwise “opinion” can’t trump “reality”, in fact in one of these cases the GP actually could not believe his patient had an official solicitor when she asked for a referral to a new psychologist & the GP wrote a letter to the court stating at the time this person was said to be “incapacitated”, I saw her & she was fully functioning & knew what the case was about

Lawyers have no professional choice when someone does not seem to have the competence to instruct. The client has to be assessed by a Psychiatrist - though sometimes a GP is accepted.

There is a question as to why anyone’s solicitor would want to undermine their client, the answer is simple “conflict of interest” many solicitors do work for both parents & local authorities, besides local authorities create custom for the solicitor even if they are representing the parent(s) at the said time, both the people I'm aware of in fact live in the same area, have the same solicitor, same social worker, same support worker & both claim & are quite clearly capable, I find that a bit odd to say the least.

It is right to say that if someone is deemed incompetent they are likely to lose the case - if too incapacitated to instruct the parent is unlikely to be able to parent. And most of the time if parents are at that level they really cannot safely parent unless they are properly supported

You make a great point & this is exactly what I suspected, parents who are considered “incapable to instruct a solicitor” will get no legal representation because they are considered by default to be too incapable to parent, this is why the official solicitor route is getting more & more popular between professionals, after all the parents are bound to fight back, but tell an Official Solicitor that the person is “incapable” & provided the certificate & you have won without any hassle & the parent is overridden regardless of their objections, after all they are just “incapable”.

I would really like to know the official figures of how many children the Official Solicitor does get back from the state, I suspect it would be an handful at best, at worse zero.
jacquig said…
When I say lawyers have no professional choice about whether to invite the OS to act I mean just that. If a lawyer has a concern about a parent's capacity to instruct our professional code of conduct obliges us to have that investigated and if a Psychiatrist agrees that the parent lacks capacity the OS must be invited to act. It is not done because of any wish to undermine the client's case although I accept that it often has that effect. Solicitors do not in fact generally take work from parents and the local authority but barristers do although personally I try to avoid working for and against the same local authority.
One of the things that could be looked at more carefully is the test which is used by Psychiatrists to determine whether someone is not competent to give instructions. It would also be useful to have some more guidelines for lawyers on what to do if someone is 'incompetent'. I will do a post on my own blog - bloody relations.
jacquig
John Hemming said…
Why the OS, why not a family friend. Masterman-LIster v Brutton is quite clear in any event.

There are lawyers that use advocates to assist parents who really do have learning difficulties - avoiding a "next friend". However, there are too many con tricks in this part of procedure.

Popular posts from this blog

Standards Board and Ken Livingstone

The link is to the case where Ken Livingstone appealed the decision of the Adjudication Panel for England.

The Standards Board and associated Adjudication Panel have done a lot of damage to democracy in the UK. The courts are, however, bringing them into more sanity.

The point about Ken Livingstone's case is that it was high profile and he also could afford to appeal. The Standard Board has a problem in that those subject to its enquiries face substantial costs that they cannot claim back.

This is an issue that needs further work.

In essence the Judge found that what he said brought him into disrepute, but not the office of Mayor. We do need the machinery of the SBE and APE to concentrate on things that matter rather than people being rude to each other.

Problems with Outlook Express - emails lost dbx corruption

In the light of the enthusiasm shown for my post relating to the OCX control that must not be named (and probably Microsoft's most embarrassing error of recent years) I thought I would write someting about Outlook Express.

Outlook Express is the email client that comes as part of windows. I use it myself, although I have my emails filtered through a spam filter of my own devising written in java. It takes email off a number of servers using POP3 (Post Office Protocol TCP Port 110) and sends it using SMTP (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol port 25).

I have recently spent a few hours dealing with the problem that arises when .dbx files get corrupted during compacting.

Outlook Express (OE) stores the emails (and other things) in files with the suffix .dbx. Each folder has its own .dbx file. They are stored in hidden directories. This makes it harder to deal with things when OE goes wrong.

It is very important to back up your stored *.dbx files as otherwise if you have a disk crash/stol…

Statement re False Allegations Campaign

Many people will know that my family and I have been subject to a campaign of false allegations by Esther Baker for the past 4 1/2 years. Yesterday there was a court judgment Baker v Hemming [2019] EWHC 2950 (QB) which formally confirmed that the allegations were false. Esther Baker, who had brought a libel claim against me, dropped her defence of Truth to my counter-claim and was taken by the judge as no longer trying to prove her allegations. Due to Baker's various breaches of court rules and orders, she has been barred from further repeating her allegations even in the court proceedings. Further claim of mine in libel against Baker are ongoing. There is a good summary in the Daily Mail here.

This demonstrates the challenge in fighting false allegations in today's Britain. A substantial campaign was built up to promote allegations which had no substance to them. Various Labour MPs and in pa…