Skip to main content

Metaphyseal Fractures

This seems to be another diagnostic of child abuse. The real question is how valid it is as a diagnostic. There is no question that it has been used. The Webster Family is one family with many children taken off them because of "metaphyseal fractures".

Of all the injuries observed in child physical abuse, none is more specific than the metaphyseal fracture. First described in 1957 by the eminent pediatric radiologist John Caffey, metaphyseal fracture is virtually pathognomonic of abuse. Kleinman et al coined the term "classic metaphyseal lesion" (CML) to describe the injury. CMLs are relatively common in abused infants and are discovered in 39%-50% of abused children less than 18 months of age. Overall, CMLs most often occur in the distal femur, proximal tibia, distal tibia, and proximal humerus. They are seen almost exclusively in children less than 2 years of age.

pathognomic, pathognomonic
a. a. aiding diagnosis; distinctive

News Item re Websters (Hardinghams)
The expert added that the number and nature of the metaphyseal fractures suggested “that all the child's limbs were forcibly twisted on one or more occasion with enough force to cause the fractures”.

Comments

Maybe it is time the scientists on dna, gene knowledge! need to be consulted, as usually the 3rd generation things can be apparent and sometimes skip a generation. ref. to take a look at are.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/gcsebitesize/sosteacher/biology/43870.shtml
You have inherited half your genes from each of your parents, so you will show some characteristics of each of them. You may also get some hidden recessive genes from both of them, and show an apparently new characteristic.

Finally, sometimes the mechanisms of genetics go wrong, and a totally new gene or gene combination appears by accident. This is called mutation, and it usually leads to problems. Down’s syndrome is caused by mutation.



In Mendel’s famous experiments with peas, he crossed (interbred) tall and short pea plants. You might expect that he’d have got medium-sized plants in the next generation (F1 generation), but instead he found that they were all tall. So, there was no blending together.
Mendel then bred these F1 plants, and in the following generation he found some short plants again, but still no medium-sized ones. So, this showed that the gene for short had been carried through the F1 generation without being in any way changed or blended.


also

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/sci_tech/2000/human_genome/749026.stm
Modern genetics may be promising to revolutionise medicine, and even change what it means to be human, but the origins of the science stem from a humble origin - peas.

In the 1860s, the Moravian monk Gregor Mendel pioneered the study of inheritance. He cultivated nearly 30,000 pea plants, carefully analysing seed and plant characteristics.

By following certain traits through the generations, he realised that some traits appeared to be dominant while others would be recessive and fail to show when certain pea plants where crossed.

Mendel's work was extraordinary, but it was many decades before his research received the recognition it deserved.

There's an answer out there somewhere just the ss do not do the research they should, as they will say they not got the money to it, but that is no excuse to not investigate all avenues and end up seperate a family due to neglecting their duties.
john said…
The webster case concluded that the CMLs were caused by a shortage of vitamin C as a result of prescribed diet deficiencies from feeding the baby on Soya Milk without supplements.

Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

Homelessness vs Selling Books

Candidates in elections tend to find themselves very busy with lots of things to do.  It is, therefore, necessary to prioritise things to ensure that the important things are dealt with.

To me the issue of homelessness and rough sleeping is an important issue.  Therefore, when Birmingham's Faith Leaders group contacted me to ask me what I would propose and whether I would work with them to make things better I was pleased to respond with my views and indicate that I would work with them after the election.

The Faith Leaders Group (Bishops and other religious leaders in Birmingham) have now sent out their report.

Sadly, according to their report,  I was the only candidate for Yardley to respond.  The group in their report said:

"Particularly disappointing was the lack of response from some of those candidates seeking re-election as MP for their respective constituencies."
It is worth looking at the priorities of my opponent.
Interestingly today she has decided to be at th…

Millionaires and politics

The Labour Party spent most of the last election criticising me for being a successful businessman (aka millionaire). That is business in the private sector employing over 250 people. It is worth looking at the situation for the Labour Candidate now:

For the year 2016-7 Annual Income from Parliament74,962Specifically for her book51,250Other media income etc5,322.82Total declared income131,534.82

Traditionally anyone with an annual income of over £100,000 has been considered to be a millionaire. I did not use my position in parliament to increase my income.


I have been asked for sources for this. This BBC piece looks at how one should define rich. It was written in 2011 so the figures will be slightly out of date. There are perhaps 2 relevant pieces:
"In 1880 a rich person would have had £100,000 in assets or an income of £10,000 a year, he says. About a hundred people a year died leaving £100,000 and by 1910 this was 250 - "a microscopic fraction of the number of death…