Skip to main content

Ebola - controlling it in Africa is key

This chart from the BBC demonstrates clearly the problem with Ebola and the solution.

ebola_cumulative_8_october
Ebola is, of course, a threat to everyone in the world. However, the chart demonstrates how Nigeria has kept tight control of infection whereas Liberia has been particularly bad at controlling infection (starting in 3rd place, but racing into 1st place).

It is important that we recognise that it is possible that an infected person from one of the infected countries (Sierra Leone, Senegal, Nigeria, The USA, Spain and Liberia) could come into the UK without us knowing that this is happening in advance.

It is, in fact, likely that an unidentified infected person will go somewhere else in the world. What is important is that we recognise what to do in the event that someone does come to the UK.

The key for people in the UK is the following (from the BBC):
Symptoms of Ebola include fever, headache, vomiting, diarrhoea and bleeding - but these are similar to more common infections like flu and some stomach bugs.
If you have these symptoms and have had contact with an Ebola patient,ring 111 first. Do not go directly to A&E or a GP.
If there has been no contact with Ebola, seek help from 111, your GP or A&E if necessary.
The chances of developing Ebola in the UK are low.
The solution from the chart is to ensure that the countries in Africa bring it under control by isolating victims. Symptomless victims are not that infectious.  Furthermore the infection cannot be transmitted in the air, but only through bodily fluids.

The second case of someone infected in the USA demonstrates that it is health care workers that are most at risk as the greatest risk of infection arises when infected people demonstrate symptoms.  That is why in the instructions above people who might have Ebola are asked not to go to A&E or their GP, but instead to phone for help.   Obviously someone who has been treating a patient with Ebola is at a high risk.

We will see from Spain how effectively Spain copes with the infection of an Ebola Nurse (Teresa Romero).  Their initial response was not good, but they  have isolated now 16 people who had contact with her and initial reports are good.

100 people have already been prevented from travelling through the screening at departure airports.  Although most had Malaria this is an essential step.  I also support the government's proposals to screen at arrival airports.  This may not identify any more people, but even if it only identified one at risk person that would help.  Furthermore it adds to the education process for people to be aware that Ebola is a possible infection.

We also need to look at whether a small period of quarantine or independent monitoring of contacts before travelling by air would also assist in preventing the spread of Ebola from the most infected three countries.   The difficulty, of course, is dealing with people who are travelling via other countries and obviously also those not travelling by air.

Happily the government are doing daily monitoring of travellers from Ebola countries. However, they are only monitoring the high risk individuals.  They should monitor all for 21 days with daily phone calls or texts.  That way would pick up quickly any cases that were missed.  It is in the interests both of the traveller and the UK for cases to be picked up as quickly as possible.








Comments

Unknown said…
If I get myself infected with Ibola and hopefully survive the treatment to what extent am I then immune?... would I be able to then offer myself as a carer without any of the need for protective gear which alienates the carer from the patient.
John Hemming said…
Not an approach I would recommend with a 70% mortality rate.

Popular posts from this blog

Standards Board and Ken Livingstone

The link is to the case where Ken Livingstone appealed the decision of the Adjudication Panel for England. The Standards Board and associated Adjudication Panel have done a lot of damage to democracy in the UK. The courts are, however, bringing them into more sanity. The point about Ken Livingstone's case is that it was high profile and he also could afford to appeal. The Standard Board has a problem in that those subject to its enquiries face substantial costs that they cannot claim back. This is an issue that needs further work. In essence the Judge found that what he said brought him into disrepute, but not the office of Mayor. We do need the machinery of the SBE and APE to concentrate on things that matter rather than people being rude to each other.

Problems with Outlook Express - emails lost dbx corruption

In the light of the enthusiasm shown for my post relating to the OCX control that must not be named (and probably Microsoft's most embarrassing error of recent years) I thought I would write someting about Outlook Express. Outlook Express is the email client that comes as part of windows. I use it myself, although I have my emails filtered through a spam filter of my own devising written in java. It takes email off a number of servers using POP3 (Post Office Protocol TCP Port 110) and sends it using SMTP (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol port 25). I have recently spent a few hours dealing with the problem that arises when .dbx files get corrupted during compacting. Outlook Express (OE) stores the emails (and other things) in files with the suffix .dbx. Each folder has its own .dbx file. They are stored in hidden directories. This makes it harder to deal with things when OE goes wrong. It is very important to back up your stored *.dbx files as otherwise if you have a disk cra

Statement re False Allegations Campaign

Many people will know that my family and I have been subject to a campaign of false allegations by Esther Baker for the past 4 1/2 years. Yesterday there was a court judgment Baker v Hemming [2019] EWHC 2950 (QB) which formally confirmed that the allegations were false. Esther Baker, who had brought a libel claim against me, dropped her defence of Truth to my counter-claim and was taken by the judge as no longer trying to prove her allegations. Due to Baker's various breaches of court rules and orders, she has been barred from further repeating her allegations even in the court proceedings. Further claim of mine in libel against Baker are ongoing. There is a good summary in the Daily Mail here . This demonstrates the challenge in fighting false allegations in today's Britain. A substantial campaign was built up to promote allegations which had no substance to them. Various Labour MPs and in