Skip to main content

Slovak Investigation and the International Criminal Court

I spoke last Thursday about the investigation in the Slovak Republic into corruption in the courts in England. There is a press report on Joj TV (in Slovak, but you can use Google translate on the text), here and here
The following is the statement by the General Prosecutor in the Slovak Republic

Jana Tokolyova, spokesman of the only biggest institution of investigation in the country, called General Prokuratura.

On Monday Silvia M. has made criminal complaint. On Wednesday, the director of General Prokuratura met the deputy director of National criminal agency of Police Prezidium and they have named a special agent that will deal with this case. We will not publish further information
because of possible investigation obstruction.
---------- Původní zpráva ----------

Datum: 14. 8. 2013
Předmět: Re: dotaz pro TV JOJ

Vážený pán Krpač,
V pondelok 12. 8. 2013 podala Silvia M. na Generálnej prokuratúre Slovenskej republiky trestné oznámenie. Vzhľadom na obsah trestného oznámenia, sa dnes stretlo na pracovnom rokovaní vedenie Generálnej prokuratúry so zástupcom riaditeľa Národnej kriminálnej agentúry Prezídia Policajného zboru. V trestnom konaní bude činný policajt tejto zložky Prezídia policajného zboru.
Právnu kvalifikáciu skutočností uvedených v trestnom oznámení, ako trestný čin, nebudeme uvádzať z dôvodu, že trestné konanie je v tomto štádiu neverejné a tiež, aby nedošlo k zmareniu tohto konania.
Chcela by som Vás ešte upozorniť na Vami nesprávne použitý termín. (Žaloba sa podáva na príslušný súd, obžalobu podáva prokurátor na súd) - na prokuratúru bolo podané trestné oznámenie.
Prajem Vám príjemný deň
Ing. Jana Tökölyová
hovorkyňa generálnej prokuratúry
tlačové a informačné oddelenie
Generálna prokuratúra Slovenskej republiky

I am now in discussions with various people about making a more general application to the International Criminal Court.


Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

Statement re Police investigation into Harassment and Perverting the Course of Justice.

It was recently reported that the police were not investigating the allegations of Perverting the Course of Justice that I had made. This came as a surprise to me as I had been told for some time that my allegations were to be considered once the VRR had been rejected. I have now had a very constructive meeting with Staffordshire police on Friday 29th June 2018 and the misunderstandings have been resolved. At that meeting the evidence relating to the perversion of the course of justice and the harassment campaign against my family were discussed. The police have decided to investigate both the perversion of the course of justice and also the harassment campaign. I would like to thank them for changing their decision and I accept their apology for the way in which they did that. I am also in possession of written confirmation a police force would be investigating allegations that a vulnerable witness has been harassed for trying to expose the campaign against me. I hope that the aut…

R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

I have only just found this one which I think is accurately reported below (but if it is not please give me an accurate report).


R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

November 9 1923

Editor’s comments in bold.

Here, the magistrates’ clerk retired with the bench when they were considering a charge of dangerous driving. The clerk belonged to a firm of solicitors acting in civil proceedings for the other party to the accident. It was entirely irrelevant that there had been no evidence of actual influence brought to bear on the magistrates, and the conviction was duly quashed.

It is clear that the deputy clerk was a member of the firm of solicitors engaged in the conduct of proceedings for damages against the applicant in respect of the same collision as that which gave rise to the charge that the justices were considering. It is said, and, no doubt, truly, that when that gentleman retired in the usual way with the justices, taking with him the…