Skip to main content

FJC debate on multiple removals

This is a link a debate by the family justice council about cases where mothers have 10+ children removed from them in sequence. Often the response to a removal is the bereavement response of getting pregnant which means that the strategy is very damaging.

Comments

Anonymous said…
The cases I am familiar with are pure unadulterated corruption . I believe there are a small number of cases where there are multiple removals but they are in a minority. So is this another example of muddying the waters. I recall the minutes of a particular FJC meeting recorded in the archives. The recorded information obviously related directly to the Justice for Linda Lewis case. tt could have been no other and it is often on the basis of these 'facts' that policy is formed. Needless to say the information was incorrect.

Popular posts from this blog

NHS reorganisation No 3,493,233

Followers of my blog will have seen the NHS question about how many reorganisations have we had. We've yet another. The number of PCTs (Primary Care Trusts) nationally is to halve. This means merging East and North. (and then probably HoB and south). It would be nice if people would stick with one structure. There is a quotation ( Which sadly does not appear to be a true quotation ) We trained hard . . . but it seemed that every time we were beginning to form up into teams we would be reorganized. I was to learn later in life that we tend to meet any new situation by reorganizing; and a wonderful method it can be for creating the illusion of progress while producing confusion, inefficiency, and demoralization. But has to have been originated by someone. The web link shown goes through the derivation which appears to be more linked to an anonymous British Soldier WW2 than any Roman or Greek General called by a name perming 2 out of (Gaius, Galus, Petronius and Arbiter). From the...