Skip to main content

Sunday Telegraph comment in support of Hyperinjunctions campaign

Andrew France's Story has been told in the Sunday Telegraph. There is a also a comment piece by Alasdair Palmer in support of the campaign to sustain article 5, 9 and 13 (and particularly I suppose 5) of the Bill of Rights.

Comments

MyAngel2009 said…
Firstly, John - You are a fantastic MP that genuinely goes beyond your calling in your plight for Justice and it appears as though you work diligently to make a positive change in your constituency. For that, I commend you

In addition, you have worked with true dedication to try to rectify the injustices the France Family have been subjected to. I read Chris Booker’s column “religiously“and I have followed this case in particular quite closely. With that I must say No words can possibly begin to describe the satisfaction I got when I proceeded to read your web log on my browser
. CoincidentallyI had just that moment finished reading Chris’ article, , which was written with meticulous diplomacy , as usual, and methodically edited in a futile attempt to ensure none of the “Gagging orders” had been violated.
As you can imagine, after reading the "blurb" from your addressing Parliament, the accidental juxtaposition, from the sequence in my reading, made for a great start in my day!

it could not have been planned better.

I see the plethora of work you both commit yourselves to; and not forgetting, of course, our friend Ian! From Chris' "cyber wars" with the Minister getting more intense each time he foolishly attempts to hoodwink the journalist with "not-so smooth" talking ; to your proverbial legal "slap" in the faces of those whom have abused their authority, I could not get better viewing on Channel 4!

Keep up your great work! You are a valuable MP.

I understand you had contacted my local MP in Mid-January (is). I had not heard from him, nor was I able contact him during the alleged Surgeries. I have seriously thought we no longer had an MP, until I received a flyer through my door for the Locals!

You, on the other hand, have a great following [As with Christopher and Ian]
All the best,

Michelle

Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

Homelessness vs Selling Books

Candidates in elections tend to find themselves very busy with lots of things to do.  It is, therefore, necessary to prioritise things to ensure that the important things are dealt with.

To me the issue of homelessness and rough sleeping is an important issue.  Therefore, when Birmingham's Faith Leaders group contacted me to ask me what I would propose and whether I would work with them to make things better I was pleased to respond with my views and indicate that I would work with them after the election.

The Faith Leaders Group (Bishops and other religious leaders in Birmingham) have now sent out their report.

Sadly, according to their report,  I was the only candidate for Yardley to respond.  The group in their report said:

"Particularly disappointing was the lack of response from some of those candidates seeking re-election as MP for their respective constituencies."
It is worth looking at the priorities of my opponent.
Interestingly today she has decided to be at th…

Millionaires and politics

The Labour Party spent most of the last election criticising me for being a successful businessman (aka millionaire). That is business in the private sector employing over 250 people. It is worth looking at the situation for the Labour Candidate now:

For the year 2016-7 Annual Income from Parliament74,962Specifically for her book51,250Other media income etc5,322.82Total declared income131,534.82

Traditionally anyone with an annual income of over £100,000 has been considered to be a millionaire. I did not use my position in parliament to increase my income.


I have been asked for sources for this. This BBC piece looks at how one should define rich. It was written in 2011 so the figures will be slightly out of date. There are perhaps 2 relevant pieces:
"In 1880 a rich person would have had £100,000 in assets or an income of £10,000 a year, he says. About a hundred people a year died leaving £100,000 and by 1910 this was 250 - "a microscopic fraction of the number of death…