Skip to main content

Darul Uloom - JMIC and Channel 4

JMIC is a centre in Yardley Constituency. They have for many years worked with all faiths in the area and interfaith meetings have been held at the centre. They also work closely with the local police.

Channel 4 have contracted with Hard Cash productions to place secret cameras and bugging devices in the mosque and an attached school (called Darul Uloom).

In 6 months of recording they picked up amongst other things one of the sixth form students criticising Hindus. They are publishing this tomorrow in the Depatches programme.

Well before the school was aware of the secret recording they had decided to expel this student from the school. A copy of the letter (edited to remove his name) is attached below.

I think it is misleading of Channel 4 to critise the organisation for the comments of someone who was expelled from the school for his comments. This is not the only explusion from the school over a number of years.

What is clearly the truth is that the organisation acts toward encouraging people to work together and for cooperation between people of all faiths and none. The mosque is also criticised for encouraging students to "hate the sin, but not the sinner". The mosque discourages attendees from being involved in drinking, drugs and gangs.

I think it is good for society for people to be discouraged from getting involved in drugs and gangs. Hence I think Channel 4 are wrong to criticise this.

However, what Channel 4 are doing in demonising this organisation is to create a unsafe situation for the 130 children that go to the school. The school is being closed early for the safety of the children following a discussion with the police about safety. If Channel 4 had produced a more balanced programme this would not have been necessary.

What we need are organisations committed to unity rather than segregationist ones. We also need organisations which take action against people who argue for division. JMIC and Darul Uloom are committed to unity and take action against people who argue for division.

The following letter proves that they don't tolerate racism. They have a track record of taking action. What more can you ask for?
2010 08 03 explusion


Alec said…
Did you have access to tapes in advance? I ask because it looks as if you've made these comments before you even saw the proggie.
PoliticalHackUK said…
Was the letter released to you unredacted? I know the mosque and it isn't a hotbed of radicalism, but to accuse C4 of endangering children when their programme showed clear evidence of unacceptable behaviour towards pupils is just ridiculous.

On the other hand, I remain concerned that Dispatches does seem to have a particular fixation with the darker side of Islam.
Steve V said…
I'm not entirely sure how you can state that:

"The following letter proves that they don't tolerate racism"

The documentary quite clearly shows the indoctrination of hatred to all other faiths, and even to other Muslims who don't follow the same cultural values.

To say that it is unbalanced is irrelevant. That would be like saying that the coverage of a murderer is unfair because he only did it once or twice in his life. Some things are totally unacceptable; indoctrinating hatred to fellow men who do not share your beliefs is one of them.

Do your views stand within your political party, will you be supported in these views by Nick Clegg?
Alec said…
I watched the proggie. At the beginning, Anne Cryer makes the apposite point that this wouldn't be tolerated at Sunday Schools attended by White kids.

>> On the other hand, I remain concerned that Dispatches does seem to have a particular fixation with the darker side of Islam.

Dispatches is produced by a cadre of professional journalists and documentary makers who investigate a wheen of subjects, only some of which deal with Islam in Britain.

A fortnight or so ago, a newspaper article showed Steven Green - a man so reviled that he failed to get a cheer on Newsnight when he denounced the invasion of Iraq - to be a wife-beater. If his views were as common in contemporary Christianity as such scenes shown last night are in Islam, I am sure there'd be an interest.
Tom Atkins said…
"The following letter proves that they don't tolerate racism."

It proves nothing of the sort.

There is clearly a serious problem at this school which, thanks to Channel 4, has been brought to light.

The documentary brought into sharp focus the insidious danger that faith schools (and not just Muslim ones) represent for the future cohesion of our society. Channel 4 deserves thanks for this, not laughable accusations of endangering children!

Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

Homelessness vs Selling Books

Candidates in elections tend to find themselves very busy with lots of things to do.  It is, therefore, necessary to prioritise things to ensure that the important things are dealt with.

To me the issue of homelessness and rough sleeping is an important issue.  Therefore, when Birmingham's Faith Leaders group contacted me to ask me what I would propose and whether I would work with them to make things better I was pleased to respond with my views and indicate that I would work with them after the election.

The Faith Leaders Group (Bishops and other religious leaders in Birmingham) have now sent out their report.

Sadly, according to their report,  I was the only candidate for Yardley to respond.  The group in their report said:

"Particularly disappointing was the lack of response from some of those candidates seeking re-election as MP for their respective constituencies."
It is worth looking at the priorities of my opponent.
Interestingly today she has decided to be at th…

Millionaires and politics

The Labour Party spent most of the last election criticising me for being a successful businessman (aka millionaire). That is business in the private sector employing over 250 people. It is worth looking at the situation for the Labour Candidate now:

For the year 2016-7 Annual Income from Parliament74,962Specifically for her book51,250Other media income etc5,322.82Total declared income131,534.82

Traditionally anyone with an annual income of over £100,000 has been considered to be a millionaire. I did not use my position in parliament to increase my income.

I have been asked for sources for this. This BBC piece looks at how one should define rich. It was written in 2011 so the figures will be slightly out of date. There are perhaps 2 relevant pieces:
"In 1880 a rich person would have had £100,000 in assets or an income of £10,000 a year, he says. About a hundred people a year died leaving £100,000 and by 1910 this was 250 - "a microscopic fraction of the number of death…