Skip to main content

Family Justice System: Petition

John Hemming:

I have an example of egregious behaviour by the family justice system to present.

The petition states:

The Petition of a British Citizen

Declares that a Local Authority has recently told a mother that she will not be allowed contact with her adopted child if she continues to protest outside the Family Court.

The Petitioner therefore requests that the House of Commons urges the government to legislate to prevent Local Authorities from using control over contact with their children to prevent parents from protesting about the unfairness of the Family Justice System in England and Wales.

And the Petitioner remains, etc.

Comments

sparrow1 said…
Does Parliament need to legislate on this subject? Surely a citizen has a right to protest guaranteed under the HRA? Has the Family Court committed to this gagging policy too - although the Family Courts regularly abuse human rights of both children and adults getting them to commit an order in writing preventing such a protest might be a toughie for the LA to perform.

I doubt the government would be interested in inacting any such legislation - even if it was needed - they are allowing the Family Courts to dig themselves into their hole day-by-day. I think the reason (Warning - conspiracy theory approaching!) is so they can justify the executive being able to excert more control over the judiciary in the future.

One thing Labour hates is judges bouncing their pet projects (anti-terrorism law, deportations etc.) Thanks to the Family Courts Divisions, if it becomes necessary the government will be able to justify being able to introduce laws to have, say, the facility for the government to have judges sacked, on the basis that the Family Courts Divisions are rogue, and only Government intervention could resolve the abuses. Seeing as the judiciary won't solve or address the problems - every Judge in the land is now vulnerable to lawful intervention from the State(and they thought Father4Justice were their biggest headache!)

The public won't accept the judiciaries bleatings about the threat to freedoms if the judiciary are rendered under the control by the State; all the government would do would be to drip-feed Family Court scandals to the media.

Popular posts from this blog

Millionaires and politics

The Labour Party spent most of the last election criticising me for being a successful businessman (aka millionaire). That is business in the private sector employing over 250 people. It is worth looking at the situation for the Labour Candidate now:

For the year 2016-7 Annual Income from Parliament74,962Specifically for her book51,250Other media income etc5,322.82Total declared income131,534.82

Traditionally anyone with an annual income of over £100,000 has been considered to be a millionaire. I did not use my position in parliament to increase my income.


I have been asked for sources for this. This BBC piece looks at how one should define rich. It was written in 2011 so the figures will be slightly out of date. There are perhaps 2 relevant pieces:
"In 1880 a rich person would have had £100,000 in assets or an income of £10,000 a year, he says. About a hundred people a year died leaving £100,000 and by 1910 this was 250 - "a microscopic fraction of the number of death…

Gender Issues comparison of candidates

John Hemming believes that an MP should represent everyone in their constituency.  This should be regardless of their race, religion, gender, abledness, sexual orientation or anything else.  It should be everyone.

When he was an MP he worked on issues relating to men, those relating to women and those relating to non-binary people. Everyone.

For example here is John Hemming on a demonstration outside the courts with the campaign group Women Against Rape (it related to the case of a mother who had her child removed from her because the mother was raped).




Jess Phillips, who campaigns on women's issues, notwithstanding the questions asked about her appointments in her parliamentary office, had the following response when asked for a debate on issues specifically relating to men:

The Labour Candidate's Book Promotion Tour and Why It Matters

In the 2015 General Election the Labour Candidate criticised John Hemming for having an external interest and made a pledge that she would be a "Full Time MP for Yardley and my only other job will be mom & carer ...".  Here is a copy of that pledge:


Since that point she has been working on paid Television Programmes and has also written a book. John Hemming has made no secret of the fact that he chairs the board of the company he founded in 1983. This involves one meeting a month. When he was the MP for Yardley he was a full time MP and the Job of being MP for Yardley came first. The Labour candidate has reported 1,274 hours of work other than being an MP in the two years she has been elected and her income in the last year was over £131,000.

Ignoring the question as to how she reconciles that with her "pledge" the question is raised as to what extent her external activity conflicts with the role of Member of Parliament for Yardley. She is supposed to de…