Skip to main content

Family Justice System: Petition

John Hemming:

I have an example of egregious behaviour by the family justice system to present.

The petition states:

The Petition of a British Citizen

Declares that a Local Authority has recently told a mother that she will not be allowed contact with her adopted child if she continues to protest outside the Family Court.

The Petitioner therefore requests that the House of Commons urges the government to legislate to prevent Local Authorities from using control over contact with their children to prevent parents from protesting about the unfairness of the Family Justice System in England and Wales.

And the Petitioner remains, etc.

Comments

sparrow1 said…
Does Parliament need to legislate on this subject? Surely a citizen has a right to protest guaranteed under the HRA? Has the Family Court committed to this gagging policy too - although the Family Courts regularly abuse human rights of both children and adults getting them to commit an order in writing preventing such a protest might be a toughie for the LA to perform.

I doubt the government would be interested in inacting any such legislation - even if it was needed - they are allowing the Family Courts to dig themselves into their hole day-by-day. I think the reason (Warning - conspiracy theory approaching!) is so they can justify the executive being able to excert more control over the judiciary in the future.

One thing Labour hates is judges bouncing their pet projects (anti-terrorism law, deportations etc.) Thanks to the Family Courts Divisions, if it becomes necessary the government will be able to justify being able to introduce laws to have, say, the facility for the government to have judges sacked, on the basis that the Family Courts Divisions are rogue, and only Government intervention could resolve the abuses. Seeing as the judiciary won't solve or address the problems - every Judge in the land is now vulnerable to lawful intervention from the State(and they thought Father4Justice were their biggest headache!)

The public won't accept the judiciaries bleatings about the threat to freedoms if the judiciary are rendered under the control by the State; all the government would do would be to drip-feed Family Court scandals to the media.

Popular posts from this blog

NHS reorganisation No 3,493,233

Followers of my blog will have seen the NHS question about how many reorganisations have we had. We've yet another. The number of PCTs (Primary Care Trusts) nationally is to halve. This means merging East and North. (and then probably HoB and south). It would be nice if people would stick with one structure. There is a quotation ( Which sadly does not appear to be a true quotation ) We trained hard . . . but it seemed that every time we were beginning to form up into teams we would be reorganized. I was to learn later in life that we tend to meet any new situation by reorganizing; and a wonderful method it can be for creating the illusion of progress while producing confusion, inefficiency, and demoralization. But has to have been originated by someone. The web link shown goes through the derivation which appears to be more linked to an anonymous British Soldier WW2 than any Roman or Greek General called by a name perming 2 out of (Gaius, Galus, Petronius and Arbiter). From the...